cos they can and u cant do anything about it!
No, Canada does not possess nuclear weapons. Canada is a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and has opted not to develop or possess atomic bombs.
The Einstein-Szilard letter warned President Roosevelt that Germany might be developing atomic weapons and recommended that the US also pursue this research to stay ahead. It urged the US government to take action and prioritize efforts towards nuclear research before Germany could potentially develop such weapons.
Nuclear weapons are typically created and declared by countries that have developed the capability to produce them. Declarations of possessing nuclear weapons are often made by official government leaders or through public statements from a country's nuclear program authorities.
As far as I know nuclear weapons have never been traded between countries, so if a country has nuclear weapons it is due to their own science and technology, or to espionage activities to get the required knowledge. The other criterion is not to have signed up to the Non Proliferation Treaty, except for countries that had already developed weapons when the Treaty came into being.
Actually this is false most of the Cold War era nuclear weapons have been destroyed.At the peak of the Cold War the U.S. had about 10,000 strategic and 20,000 tactical nuclear weapons and the USSR had about 10,000 strategic and 30,000 tactical nuclear weapons.Following the signing of START both sides agreed to destroy all tactical nuclear weapons and reduce strategic nuclear weapons slowly over a period of time.At this time both the U.S. and Russia have about 3,500 strategic nuclear weapons each and no tactical nuclear weapons (although some people say that Russia secretly maintains about 1,000 tactical nuclear weapons).So, from a peak of about 70,000 nuclear weapons during the Cold War to about 7,000 nuclear weapons now, only about 10% of the weapons then available still remain ready for use.
Manhattan Project
Japan has the technological capability to develop nuclear weapons quickly, but it has chosen not to do so due to its commitment to a non-nuclear policy.
Because the French government at some point thought they needed to develop such weapons. France got their first nuclear bomb in 1960.
no
because their time had come.
Originally the USSR was assisting them with reactors and was promising to supply nuclear weapons if needed, so China would not have to develop their own. However the USSR withdrew from this agreement in 1959. This caused China to begin their own nuclear weapons project, culminating in their first test in 1964. So nobody assisted China to develop nuclear weapons. They did it on their own.
In WW2 I believe they were trying to.
India is already a nuclear power, and they have nuclear weapons on hand. They have already made the decision to "encourage" nuclear weapons, and presumably for increasing their own security.
Any answer to this question would be pure opinion, but I sincerely believe that nations should not have the freedom to develop nuclear weapons. The more nations that have them, the more likely it becomes that they will be used.
No, Canada does not possess nuclear weapons. Canada is a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and has opted not to develop or possess atomic bombs.
Manhattan Project.
No because they will just attack us.they already have to many nuclear weapons they dont need anymore.