Icebergs have a greater amount of internal energy compared to ice cubes because icebergs are much larger in size and mass, thus containing more molecules that contribute to their internal energy. The larger volume of an iceberg also allows it to absorb more heat from its surroundings, increasing its internal energy.
Definitely the iceberg because it is much more massive compared to the others. Keep in mind internal energy is more than just heat. One exception would be if the iceberg was at absolute zero, but i doubt that is the case.
The overall kinetic energy of the iceberg could be found using the following formula:Ek = (1/2) * m * v2Therefore, the mass and velocity of the iceberg would need to be known, before you could calculate the kinetic energy. This information wasn't given in the question, so I can't take this calculation any further
Kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the speed. If an object doesn't move quickly, it will usually not have much kinetic energy. Or it might, depending on the mass. Make some assumptions about the mass of your iceberg, and its speed, and do the calculations for the amount of kinetic energy (which is equal to 1/2 x mass x speed squared).
why is because think about it a pot of water has a little bit of water so that means little bit of molecules. and an iceberg has to many. so even though an ice berg is cold doesn't mean its not heated so there are more moving molecules moving les fast then a small pot of water moving more fast and you should mesure it in kelvin aka 0* as lowest.
The asteroid with the greater mass will possess a greater amount of kinetic energy when approaching Earth at the same speed.
Definitely the iceberg because it is much more massive compared to the others. Keep in mind internal energy is more than just heat. One exception would be if the iceberg was at absolute zero, but i doubt that is the case.
The overall kinetic energy of the iceberg could be found using the following formula:Ek = (1/2) * m * v2Therefore, the mass and velocity of the iceberg would need to be known, before you could calculate the kinetic energy. This information wasn't given in the question, so I can't take this calculation any further
Kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the speed. If an object doesn't move quickly, it will usually not have much kinetic energy. Or it might, depending on the mass. Make some assumptions about the mass of your iceberg, and its speed, and do the calculations for the amount of kinetic energy (which is equal to 1/2 x mass x speed squared).
why is because think about it a pot of water has a little bit of water so that means little bit of molecules. and an iceberg has to many. so even though an ice berg is cold doesn't mean its not heated so there are more moving molecules moving les fast then a small pot of water moving more fast and you should mesure it in kelvin aka 0* as lowest.
Total amount of kinetic energy and potential energy of all the particles in a substance.
First note that "thermal energy" is a term that is long since obsolete. The correct term is "Internal Energy". "Thermal energy" was a term that was in use when people thought of energy as being some kind of fluid called "caloric" that was transferred between things at different temperatures. With that said: an iceberg has more internal energy when compared to a hot cup of coffee mainly due to the variance in size. Total internal energy is not necessarily determined by the presence of heat but the mass of the molecules present.
The asteroid with the greater mass will possess a greater amount of kinetic energy when approaching Earth at the same speed.
Definitely LESS energy than a huge iceberg.
The amount of particles in an object affects temperature by influencing the object's internal energy. More particles typically result in a higher internal energy, leading to a higher temperature. Conversely, fewer particles usually result in lower internal energy and a lower temperature.
No.Thermal energy refers to the amount of heat energy a mass holds.Temperature refers to how hot a mass is.* They are related but they are not the same. If the temperature of a mass is increased, the thermal energy of that mass will also increase.AnswerThe term, 'thermal energy', is obsolete, having been replaced with the term, 'internal energy'. Internal energy and temperature are linked in the sense that the higher a body's internal energy, the higher its temperature. However, internal energy also depends on the state of a body. For example, water and ice can coexist at zero degrees Celsius, but the water will always have a higher internal energy than the ice at that temperature.These days, 'heat' is defined as energy in transit between a hotter body and a cooler body. It's NOT the same thing as internal energy.
A warmer substance has more thermal energy than a cooler one, which is a measure of the internal energy present in a system. The higher temperature of the substance indicates that its molecules are moving faster, leading to a greater amount of thermal energy.
The amount of energy in a wave is determined by its amplitude, which is the height of the wave from the equilibrium position. Waves with greater amplitude carry more energy.