It is due to its inertia of motion
No, distance does not affect the body's acceleration when moving in a straight line with constant acceleration. The acceleration of an object depends only on the force acting on it, not the distance it travels. The acceleration will remain constant unless a different force is applied.
The displacement-time graph for a body moving in a straight line with uniformly increasing speed would be a straight line with a positive slope. As time increases, the displacement of the body also increases at a constant rate.
If a body is moving in a straight line then it would have angular momentum about any point which is not along its line of motion. The magnitude of the angular momentum would be its velocity times the perpendicular distance between the line of motion and the point.
If the displacement-time graph of a body is a straight line, it indicates that the body is moving with a constant velocity. The slope of the line represents the velocity of the body - a steeper slope indicates a higher velocity.
No, centripetal force is not acting when a body is moving in a straight line. Centripetal force is required to keep an object moving in a curved path.
No, distance does not affect the body's acceleration when moving in a straight line with constant acceleration. The acceleration of an object depends only on the force acting on it, not the distance it travels. The acceleration will remain constant unless a different force is applied.
Inertia
The displacement-time graph for a body moving in a straight line with uniformly increasing speed would be a straight line with a positive slope. As time increases, the displacement of the body also increases at a constant rate.
If a body is moving in a straight line then it would have angular momentum about any point which is not along its line of motion. The magnitude of the angular momentum would be its velocity times the perpendicular distance between the line of motion and the point.
yes
If the displacement-time graph of a body is a straight line, it indicates that the body is moving with a constant velocity. The slope of the line represents the velocity of the body - a steeper slope indicates a higher velocity.
For the body to be in uniform motin it must be moving in the straight line path.
No, centripetal force is not acting when a body is moving in a straight line. Centripetal force is required to keep an object moving in a curved path.
Yes, a moving body is an example of an object that moves along a straight path if its motion is in a single direction without deviating from that path. For instance, a car moving in a straight line on a road or a ball rolling in a straight line on a flat surface are examples of motion along a straight path.
When the speed of a body moving in a straight line changes continuously, the body acquires acceleration. This acceleration could be either positive (speeding up) or negative (slowing down), depending on whether the speed is increasing or decreasing.
If it was initially at rest - yes. If it was initially moving, it will continue moving at the same velocity.
When it's moving in a straight line at a constant speed. And it has nothing to do with my judgment or opinion. That's the definition.