Why is a scientist unlikely to measure length in inches?

Answer 1

A scientist is more likely to use SI units - it is much more convenient, for international communication, if everybody uses the same units.

Answer 2

If they were working together on the same project and their units were not converted to match, the project would go wrong. This happened with some of NASA's Mars probes. That is why there are International Standards (ISO) units of measure agreed worldwide and it is foolish, in the modern world for professionals not to use them.

Answer 3

Oh, dude, a scientist is unlikely to measure length in inches because the metric system is the cool kid on the block in the scientific community. It's like the popular kid at school, you know? Plus, using inches in science is so last season, like wearing socks with sandals. So, scientists stick to the metric system because it's just easier and makes everyone happy.

Answer 4

A scientist is unlikely to measure length in inches because the metric system is the standard unit of measurement in scientific research. The metric system is based on units of ten, making calculations and conversions easier. Additionally, using consistent units across the scientific community promotes accuracy and reproducibility in research.

Answer 5

• Most of the equations and constants used on physics assumes the use of metric system and you cannot mix
• SI units have been designed around easily related areas - e.g. a metre is defined in terms of a second (speed of light...)
• Metric units are more easily converted as they are in multiples of 10.

Answer 6

It could be because they want exact measurements and measuring it in inches could make it harder for them to get the right measurements

Answer 7

you lick yourelf

Answer 8

rfikl;i/fvg;ibh.kuy8gftfytfiu

Answer 9

reeeeeeee

Answer 10

mandm