0
What else can I help you with?
What is the gravity between small objects?
The force of gravity between small objects depends on their masses and the distance between them. It follows Newton's law of universal gravitation, which states that the force is proportional to the product of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
Force that causes objects to be attracted to each other?
depending on what type of field you are trying to ask. The magnetic force can made both magnet attract each other, gravitation force enable all object to attract each other( you do not fell it basically because the gravitation constant is too small and masked by other force such as frictional force).....etc
A microscope uses what to magnify objects?
An optical microscope uses a system of (usually) glass lenses to focus the small amounts of light given off by the subject into your eye.
Why is diffraction not normally observed with light?
Diffraction is normally not observed with light because the wavelength of visible light is very small compared to everyday objects. As a result, the amount of diffraction that occurs is usually negligible and not noticeable to the human eye. Additionally, factors such as the aperture size of the object and the distance between the object and the screen can affect the degree of diffraction observed.
Does a galvanometer measure small objects?
No, a galvanometer is a device used to detect and measure small electric currents. It is not typically used to measure small objects.
What is the gravity between small objects?
The force of gravity between small objects depends on their masses and the distance between them. It follows Newton's law of universal gravitation, which states that the force is proportional to the product of the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
Objects that are too small to be seen with other microscopes can be observed with a what kind of microscope?
Objects that are too small to be seen with other microscopes can be observed with an electron microscope, which uses a beam of accelerated electrons to create an image with much higher magnification and resolution than light microscopes.
Is there more gravitational force between objects with small masses or objects with large masses?
There is more gravitational force between objects with large masses compared to objects with small masses, as gravitational force increases with the mass of the objects. This is described by Newton's law of universal gravitation, which states that the force of gravity is directly proportional to the product of the masses of the two objects and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
Force that causes objects to be attracted to each other?
depending on what type of field you are trying to ask. The magnetic force can made both magnet attract each other, gravitation force enable all object to attract each other( you do not fell it basically because the gravitation constant is too small and masked by other force such as frictional force).....etc
A microscope uses what to magnify objects?
An optical microscope uses a system of (usually) glass lenses to focus the small amounts of light given off by the subject into your eye.
Why are mars moons irregularly shaped?
They're too small for their gravitation to round them up.
What was Vatican City's population in 2009?
The population of the Vatican generally runs bewteen 800 and 850 inhabitants. There is little room for more due to the small size of the country and lack of housing.
Why is diffraction not normally observed with light?
Diffraction is normally not observed with light because the wavelength of visible light is very small compared to everyday objects. As a result, the amount of diffraction that occurs is usually negligible and not noticeable to the human eye. Additionally, factors such as the aperture size of the object and the distance between the object and the screen can affect the degree of diffraction observed.
How did Aristotle inability to detect parallax lead him to propose a geocentric model of the solar system?
He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect.He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect =) Hope it helped. I had the same question
How did aristotles' inability to detect parallax lead him to propose a geocentric model of the solar system?
He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect.He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect =) Hope it helped. I had the same question
How did the Aristotle's inability to detect parallax lead him to propose a geocentric model of the solar system?
He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect.He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect =) Hope it helped. I had the same question
How did Aristotle's inability to detect parallax lead him to propose a geocentric model of the solar system?
He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect.He reasoned that since parallax could not be observed for celestial objects near the sun, then the earth was stationary. This erroneous assumption was because at the time he had no way of knowing that celestial objects were so far away that their parallax angles were too small to detect =) Hope it helped. I had the same question
