When an object is accelerated along a distance that requires energy. If the object is then slowed to a stop by a breaking system that gets back that energy then the energy is said to be conserved
I suggest you read the Wikipedia article on "energy". There is really no definition of "energy" that's short, easy to understand, and accurate; the reason for this is that "energy" is a fairly complex concept. You might say that it's a magnitude in physics that is conserved - you can't increase or decrease the total amount of energy. However, note that there are several other magnitudes in physics that are also conserved.
From thermodynamics perspective heat is also known as quantity of energy and work is known as quality of energy,the energy which is in organised form and which can be utilized for producing any kind of effort and one more thing we generally say energy is conserved here we means quantity of energy is conserved. However,quality of energy depends on the efficiency that ideally is a function of temperature. So as we increase the source temperature quality of energy increases.(carnot’s formula η =(1-Tsink/Tsource)
solar energy creates high pressure systems that come from the poles high pressure systwms cause wind that blows from the North. they are global winds. We use global winds to make wind energy so it is correct to say that wind energy and solar energy are related
Can be neither created nor destroyed
In the beginning of the 20th century. He proposed mass-energy equivalence in 1905, and set out to mathematically express this. E = mc2 shows that energy can be converted into mass, and mass into energy. Thus, we no longer say that mass is conserved, or energy is conserved. But rather, we say that mass-energy is conserved.
When an object is accelerated along a distance that requires energy. If the object is then slowed to a stop by a breaking system that gets back that energy then the energy is said to be conserved
What does it mean to say momentum is conserved?
Not quite sure what you mean; let's just say that living systems don't require any extraordinary efforts to conserve energy and mass, because that's what they do naturally, i.e., "be conserved". There is no known way to violate conservation of energy or mass.
I suggest you read the Wikipedia article on "energy". There is really no definition of "energy" that's short, easy to understand, and accurate; the reason for this is that "energy" is a fairly complex concept. You might say that it's a magnitude in physics that is conserved - you can't increase or decrease the total amount of energy. However, note that there are several other magnitudes in physics that are also conserved.
I suggest you read the Wikipedia article on "energy". There is really no definition of "energy" that's short, easy to understand, and accurate; the reason for this is that "energy" is a fairly complex concept. You might say that it's a magnitude in physics that is conserved - you can't increase or decrease the total amount of energy. However, note that there are several other magnitudes in physics that are also conserved.
I suggest you read the Wikipedia article on "energy". There is really no definition of "energy" that's short, easy to understand, and accurate; the reason for this is that "energy" is a fairly complex concept. You might say that it's a magnitude in physics that is conserved - you can't increase or decrease the total amount of energy. However, note that there are several other magnitudes in physics that are also conserved.
No. You can say that you will look into something, or that you will get someone to look into something, but you cannot say 'get look'. These are all correct: 'I will look into your problem with the leaking washing machine tomorrow.' 'I will get a plumber to look into your problem with the leaking washing machine tomorrow.' 'I will get your problem with the leaking washing machine looked into tomorrow.'
It is grammatically correct to say: There is nothing wrong with this machine.It is not grammatically correct to say: Will it is be grammatically correct to say ....The correct way to write that or say that would be: Would it be grammatically correct to say....
From thermodynamics perspective heat is also known as quantity of energy and work is known as quality of energy,the energy which is in organised form and which can be utilized for producing any kind of effort and one more thing we generally say energy is conserved here we means quantity of energy is conserved. However,quality of energy depends on the efficiency that ideally is a function of temperature. So as we increase the source temperature quality of energy increases.(carnot’s formula η =(1-Tsink/Tsource)
solar energy creates high pressure systems that come from the poles high pressure systwms cause wind that blows from the North. they are global winds. We use global winds to make wind energy so it is correct to say that wind energy and solar energy are related
Can be neither created nor destroyed