First of all it's 300 million metres per second (299,792,458 m/s). this is in a vacuum when the speed of electromagnetic radiation is at its greatest.
one million milliseconds. milli means million
Newton's second law states that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force applied to it, and inversely proportional to its mass. This can be mathematically represented as F = ma, where F is the net force, m is the mass of the object, and a is its acceleration.
The frequency of something vibrating 1 million times per second is 1 million hertz (Hz).
No, one Hz (Hertz) is equal to one cycle per second. To convert to one million cycles per second, you would need one MHz (Megahertz).
The frequency of something vibrating one million times per second is 1 MHz (megahertz).
The speed of light, or c, is a constant. The speed of light is exactly 299,792,458 meters per second IN A VACUUM. That's 670,616,629.2 miles per hour or 983,571,056 feet per second.
I'm going to remark that "The speed of light is 3 million meters per second" is NEVER correct. The speed of light in vacuum ... within 0.07% ... is 3 hundredmillion meters per second. The speed is different in any material medium, but a speed of 3 million m/s would imply a medium with a refractive index of 100, and I'm pretty sure that no such material exists.
He agrees with you. Or he is in agreement with you.
i believe that the second statement sounds the most correct '100 dollars was awarded'
No. Only if you want to get the correct answer.
This is a statement; it is not a question.
The first statement uses incorrect grammar, the second is grammatically correct.
The correct answer is D. converse. The converse of a conditional statement "If P, then Q" is formed by reversing the hypothesis and conclusion, resulting in "If Q, then P." In this context, the second statement being the converse of the first means it is derived by exchanging the positions of the two parts of the original statement.
Both "He is always getting lost" and "He always is getting lost" are correct, but the former is more common in everyday speech. Rearranging the word order in the second sentence can add emphasis to "always" but is less commonly used in formal writing.
Inverse (Tested)
The second is correct. The second is correct. The second is correct. The second is correct.
The if statement evaluates boolean (true or false) expressions. For example: if ( a = b ) or if (4 = 4 ) The first would be true if a was equal to b and false if not. The second would always be true seeing that 4 always equals 4.