0
Scientists found it difficult to understand atoms because they are extremely small, much smaller than what can be seen with the naked eye. Additionally, atoms are constantly in motion, making them difficult to observe and study. The discovery of subatomic particles like electrons, protons, and neutrons added to the complexity of understanding the structure of atoms.
What else can I help you with?
How has the progression of technology helped the development of the atom?
The progression of technology has enabled scientists to better understand the structure of the atom through tools like particle accelerators and electron microscopes. These advancements have allowed for the discovery of subatomic particles and have furthered our knowledge of atomic interactions and properties. As technology continues to advance, so too will our understanding of the atom.
Why do scientist use models of the atom when you know that they are not completely accurate?
Science tries to explain in the simplest terms concepts that the audience would understand. And often even science does not fully understand the underlying structure of things. A body (nucleus) of an atom with other bodies (electrons) circling around it is simple to visualize. A multi-quark structure or something even stranger, perhaps made of infinitesimal strings, is much harder to understand. So scientists take liberties to afford simplicity.
What did thomson's cathode-ray tube experiment help scientists learn?
Thomson's cathode-ray tube experiment helped scientists understand that electrons are negatively charged particles within atoms. This experiment contributed to the development of the plum pudding model of the atom, which proposed that electrons are embedded in a positively charged sphere within the atom.
How scientists visually look an atom?
Nobody can ever see an atom with the naked eye. Nowadays, there may be software or something to see an atom or compound in 3D. But most of this visualizing an atom, or molecule, or compound, is mostly done in our head. So basically you could say we "imagine" it, or basically visualize a 3D model of the atom in our head (so 3D thinking).
Why do scientists see a blur when they look at an atom under a microscope?
Scientists see a blur when they look at an atom under a microscope because the size of atoms is on the scale of a few tenths of a nanometer, which is smaller than the wavelength of visible light. This means that the light waves cannot resolve the details of the atom's structure, leading to a blurred image.
Why did it take so long to understand how an atom works?
Because there wasnt a way to see an atom until recently and it was by thesis that tha atom was there.
How has the progression of technology helped the development of the atom?
The progression of technology has enabled scientists to better understand the structure of the atom through tools like particle accelerators and electron microscopes. These advancements have allowed for the discovery of subatomic particles and have furthered our knowledge of atomic interactions and properties. As technology continues to advance, so too will our understanding of the atom.
What planet do scientists not observe as much as all the other planets?
Scientists do not observe Mercury as often because it is difficult to do so.
Why is it so difficult for you to learn math?
it is not difficult for me but if you find it difficult, try to understand the concept of the topic you are learning in maths. try reading the examples again and again to understand how does the equation work and how to get the solution.
Why do scientists make model?
scientists makes models so when they do the acual project they can see what to do from the scale size to the acual figure.to do scale testingscientists use models to help them understand what they are working on
Why did it take so long to discover parts of an atom?
Parts of an atom, such as protons, neutrons, and electrons, are incredibly small and difficult to detect directly. It took a long time to discover these components because early scientists lacked the technology and tools needed to observe them. Through advancements in technology and experimentation, scientists were eventually able to uncover the structure of the atom.
Is this sentence correct do you agree that this book was too difficult to understand?
Do you agree that this book is too difficult to understand ? Do you agree that this book has been too difficult to understand? The problem is the one to whom you are asking did not read the book yet, so he can't agree anyway. But, if you ask : Do you believe that this book has been too difficult to understand ? The answer could be, Yes, I do. or No, I don't.
How are you with handling accents?
being attentive and more patience, so that it will not be more difficult to understand.
Why do scientist use models of the atom when you know that they are not completely accurate?
Science tries to explain in the simplest terms concepts that the audience would understand. And often even science does not fully understand the underlying structure of things. A body (nucleus) of an atom with other bodies (electrons) circling around it is simple to visualize. A multi-quark structure or something even stranger, perhaps made of infinitesimal strings, is much harder to understand. So scientists take liberties to afford simplicity.
How many types of atom do you have?
You mean elements? So far scientists have brought out some 109 elements. If you mean atom model, then first Prout's model Then Thomson's, Rutherford's, Bohr's, Sommerfeld's. Finally vector atom model.
What is the importance of scientific names?
It provides a way to communicate names in a global language so that scientists worldwide will understand.
What did thomson's cathode-ray tube experiment help scientists learn?
Thomson's cathode-ray tube experiment helped scientists understand that electrons are negatively charged particles within atoms. This experiment contributed to the development of the plum pudding model of the atom, which proposed that electrons are embedded in a positively charged sphere within the atom.
