A beach ball would not have density, as density is a measure of an object's mass divided by its volume. Both the beach ball and the beach would have different densities due to their composition and materials.
No, a lead ball is more dense than a sponge ball because lead has a higher density compared to the sponge material. Density is the measure of how much mass is contained in a given volume, so the lead ball would have more mass packed into the same volume as the sponge ball.
The steel ball would likely cause more damage due to its higher density and weight compared to the wooden and plastic balls. The steel ball would hit the ground with more force, leading to more impact and potential damage upon landing.
I can't see the specific ball you're dealing with. If it sinks in water, then it's more dense than water. If it floats on water, then it's less dense than water.
A beach ball is more buoyant than a hammer and rock because it is made of materials that are less dense than water, allowing it to displace more water and float easier. In contrast, hammers and rocks are denser than water, causing them to sink instead of float. Buoyancy depends on the weight and volume of an object and the density of the fluid it is in.
There are more particles of gas in the basketball than in the beach ball. So, more particles hit the inside surface of the basketball than hit the inside surface of the beach ball. When more particles hit the inside surface of the basketball, the force on the inside surface of the ball increases. This increased force leads to greater pressure, which makes the basketball feel harder than the beach ball. Hope this helps :)
No, a lead ball is more dense than a sponge ball because lead has a higher density compared to the sponge material. Density is the measure of how much mass is contained in a given volume, so the lead ball would have more mass packed into the same volume as the sponge ball.
billard ball because it has more density
It depends on the speed and the mass but in general a higher density object would be worse. Everything else being equal, it makes sesnes that being hit by an iron cannonball is more serious than being hit by a tennis ball of the same size. The cannon ball is highhigh density and the tennis ball is low density.
cottan balls The previous answer was surely a joke. The answer is rocks.
The steel ball would likely cause more damage due to its higher density and weight compared to the wooden and plastic balls. The steel ball would hit the ground with more force, leading to more impact and potential damage upon landing.
I can't see the specific ball you're dealing with. If it sinks in water, then it's more dense than water. If it floats on water, then it's less dense than water.
A beach ball is more buoyant than a hammer and rock because it is made of materials that are less dense than water, allowing it to displace more water and float easier. In contrast, hammers and rocks are denser than water, causing them to sink instead of float. Buoyancy depends on the weight and volume of an object and the density of the fluid it is in.
A bowling ball.
There are more particles of gas in the basketball than in the beach ball. So, more particles hit the inside surface of the basketball than hit the inside surface of the beach ball. When more particles hit the inside surface of the basketball, the force on the inside surface of the ball increases. This increased force leads to greater pressure, which makes the basketball feel harder than the beach ball. Hope this helps :)
Think of it this way if you have a golf ball and a wiffle ball they are the same size but they don't weight the same. The golf ball weighs more because it has a greater density In a more mathematical sense, density = mass / volume. If both minerals had the same mass, the more dense one must have a smaller volume.
A penny
Most likely the bowling ball. According to the laws of physics, an object with more inertia accelerates slower but is harder to stop. The bowling ball accelerates ...