Rafflesias do not have leaves. They are a type of parasitic flowering plant that lacks typical plant structures like leaves, stems, and roots, as they rely entirely on their host plants for nutrients. Instead, they grow from the tissues of their host, producing a large, distinctive flower that can be several feet in diameter. Their unique morphology is adapted to their specific ecological niche.
The Giant rafflesias plant
around 3000
i think they are red and white ,dude!
both
The Rafflesia plant is a parasite, not a carnivorous plant. It doesn't eat anything or anybody. It does, however, grow as a parasite inside a particular vine in undisturbed rainforests, taking all its nourishment from the vine. The raffesia plant does not show any roots, stems or leaves but it does make one heck of a flower!
The Rafflessia lives at Tropical rain forest and is the largest flower. In the genus book, it is recorded as 91cm and weighed 15lbs. It is a endangered species so we have to stop it.
I'm only guessing based on their relatives but I'd say probably all of them to some degree or other. Understand that from a botanical perspective, poisonous doesn't mean lethal. It might only give you a bad digestive upset or a bad rash or something.
These are plants without leaves
the first leaves are the primary leaves whereas the second leaves are the secondary leaves.
leaves
What leaves
leaves- kangkong leaves, malungay ,gabi leaves camote tops