It depends on how man maintains trees. If man clear-cuts (cuts down all the trees in an area) and does not replace them, then no, they are not renewable. However, if man cuts only the mature trees from a forest and leaves the rest, the younger trees will grow and seeds from those trees will produce new trees. In that case, trees are renewable and the forest will keep reseeding itself. Man can also plant young trees to replace those he cuts.
Coal is a nonrenewable resource, while pine trees are a renewable resource. As sources of energy, the difference between coal and pine trees is that coal is a nonrenewable resource, while pine trees are a renewable resource.
It is a nonrenewable resource.
Oranges are a fruit that is grown, and are renewable. I don't know if I would call fruit a resource, though.
its not a nonrenewable resource because its a renewable resource
yes its a nonrenewable resource.
Radiata Pine, a variety of pine tree, is renewable in the sense that you can grow more of them.
Trees of whatever type are renewable, because you can grow more of them.
Bismuth is a nonrenewable resource but wastes can by recycled.
It's neither a resource, nor is it nonrenewable.
Natural gas is a nonrenewable resource.
renewable or renewable resource
Natural gas is a nonrenewable resource.