the fish will die . because the fish needed by theplants which qive oxygen .. !
The wetland would be warn away by erosion.
The ecosystem would not be successful. Eg, plants are eaten by deer. If the plants were removed, the deer would have to look for another food or die.
The soil will no longer be healthy for plants
the trees give us oxygen so......we would die.
how would aquatic plants be affected when ther are reverse
The plant would die. Plants need co2 to make oxygen which humans and animals need to exist.
what would happen to plants nutrition if plants did not have roots
Everything that ate the plants would die causing everything that ate the animals that ate the plants to die. so everything would die.
If there were no underwater plants like hydrilla, aquatic ecosystems would suffer significantly. These plants provide essential habitats and food sources for various aquatic organisms, including fish and invertebrates. The absence of such vegetation would lead to decreased biodiversity, disrupted food chains, and increased water pollution due to the lack of natural filtration and oxygen production. Overall, the health of aquatic environments and the species that depend on them would be severely compromised.
Probable the aquatic life would be impossible.
smaller fish and plants
If aquatic plants were to die out due to pollution, it would significantly disrupt the food web. These plants, as primary producers, form the foundation of the ecosystem by providing oxygen and serving as food for herbivores like fish and insects. Their disappearance would lead to a decline in herbivore populations, followed by a ripple effect up the food chain, ultimately threatening the survival of predators and reducing biodiversity. Additionally, the loss of plants would result in increased water temperatures and reduced water quality, further harming aquatic life.