The ability to remove a sidewalk depends on whether it is located on private or public property. Sidewalks on private property can typically be removed with proper permits and approval from the local authorities. However, sidewalks on public property usually require permission from the relevant municipal department or government agency.
Yes, the government can take private property from an individual according to the Fifth Amendment, but only if it is for public use and the individual is provided with just compensation.
Yes, Of course you have to pay if you are at fault. If take a gun and you shoot somebody on private property you will also have to pay for that? " Yes" . We are always responsible for damage we cause to another, whether accidental or intentional, on private property or public property.
These are store policies. Basically, a store would be just like if you went to a stranger's home and wanted to take pictures inside it. A store is owned; therefore, it is private property---not public property. Now, you could take a picture of the store's sign outside, because being outside, it is a public area. BUT if the store (or mall) owns the sidewalk or parking lot on which you stand to take the picture, they can demand you leave if they don't want photographs taken. It is primarily the public versus private concept of personal and social boundaries-- if you want to take pictures, go to your own property or public property.Stores may have other concerns about inside photography, too. But it's mostly because it is their land / building and so, their right to say what you can and cannot do there.
In general, it is not illegal to take pictures of someone on private property if you are in a public place and not trespassing. However, it is important to respect people's privacy and property rights. If you are on someone's private property without permission, it may be considered trespassing and taking pictures could be illegal. It is always best to ask for permission before taking photos on private property.
Under the U.S. Constitution, the government's ability to take private property is limited by the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which requires that the government provide just compensation for any property taken for public use. This means that the government cannot take private property without fair payment to the owner.
That right is called eminent domain.
The inherent right of a government to take private property for public use is called 'eminent domain'.
A woman can take a photo of herself in most public places in the United States. There are some restrictions that apply for taking photos on private property.
Yes, with limitations. Repossessions usually take place on private property.
Basically it is the power to take private property for public use, as long as the owner is justly compensated for the value of the property (in a free market).
when it is for public use..The government can take private property for several reasons..For Public Use..For Military use in times of war(afterwards the property then reverts back to the owner)For Violating Federal Laws such as for producing illegal drugs on the property.For Failing to pay Federal income Taxes..For Failing to pay State property Taxes..The government can take privet property because he wants to take all the money so that people can rent the houses and he use the money for all the damages for all the homeless people
If the repossession agent can get to the vehicle without breaking anything or causing a civil disturbance, he can take it. Private, public, or government property, or who signed the loan is irrelevent.