Yes, "raise a mist" is an example of personification because it ascribes human-like qualities (the ability to create a mist) to a non-human entity (something that cannot physically raise a mist).
personification allusion paradox alliteration
Mist is weak. Elincia is a better version of her. Even micaiah beats her. Mist is too hard to raise
the people is always gossiping with his/her seatmate...
It could be a dead metaphor. However, there is another interpretation: It is a personification :the mist as a man and the sun as a woman who is veiled. As the sun is a source of beauty and light, it is like the beautiful woman and the mist here as a jealous man. Notice also the paradox between "the mist" as a symbol of gloom and the sun as a symbol of optimism.
The phrase "fog trails" and "mist creeps" employs personification, as it attributes human-like qualities to inanimate elements of nature. By suggesting that fog can "trail" and mist can "creep," it creates a vivid imagery that evokes a sense of movement and intention in these natural phenomena. This figurative language enhances the atmosphere and mood of the description.
Personification
It is personification without meaning to use personification
The literary term used in this passage is personification. This is because human qualities are attributed to inanimate objects like gates, dykes, and banks, making them appear as if they are crying out.
There is no personification going on here.
The root word of mist is "Mist" itself. The word "mist" comes from Old English "mist" meaning "dimness, mist" and is related to the Middle Low German "mist" meaning "dung, manure".
No, personification does not have a prefix
personification