Poetry can teach you a lot of things, just like reading. People write poetry about amazingly diverse things, and so reading poetry can teach you about those things, and about the ideas of the author.
Writing poetry can teach you even more. Poetry is a great way to learn how to be concise. You take a big idea, and effectively shrink it down to bumper-sticker size. That helps people learn how to choose the right word, instead of having to write for several sentence to get your meaning across, poetry can help you to get it across in one or two lines.
Poetry can also teach you something about beauty. Sometimes, just reading newspapers and web pages, we forget that the language can be beautiful... that words can paint pictures... that our keyboards can be used to make amazing works of art. When you read poetry, you remember those things, and suddenly, words are more friendly. Language doesn't seem awkward anymore. With poetry, you aren't standing in front of someone you like, getting everything wrong... with poetry, finally, you get it right. You say what you want to say, exactly the way it SHOULD be said by everyone who has ever been in love.
Here... be scientific. Try an experiment. Go to this poetry site http://www.loc.gov/poetry/180/p180-list.html and find some titles that appeal to you... read at least 10 poems. See if it is more interesting than reading the paper. You might learn something. You won't like them all... I don't like them all. But I like some of them a LOT, and most of them a little. There is beauty there, even in the poems that are about ugly things.
A further experiment would be to pick a topic and try to do what they do... take an idea or an emotion or an event and communicate it to someone else in short little lines. Maybe if you read enough poems, you can figure out why they are using short little lines instead of sentences and paragraphs... and maybe you'll write a great one.
"The Frog and the Nightingale" by Vikram Seth explores themes of exploitation, manipulation, and the importance of staying true to oneself. It highlights the consequences of allowing others to take advantage of one's talents and the dangers of seeking external validation at the cost of one's own identity. Additionally, the poem emphasizes the power of self-awareness and self-acceptance in overcoming adversity.
Poems can be about feeling and/or nature or even a favorite sport team !! There are many and i mean many different kinds of poems!! For instance a haiku or a limerick or an acrostic, a diamond poem, a shape poem, and many more!!!! Here's an example of a haiku:
Friends: (the title)
Friends can be called (5 syllables)
bffs' or buddies (7 syllables)
they stay 'till the end!!
Poetry uses words in a way that creates or develops ideas in the mind of the poet.
It can be about whatever you choose and for whatever reason you want.
When poetry's words themselves don't rhyme,
We call it prose and count out time.
we must be well judged about our decisions and must not come in flattering words of others . we must be aware of such people
Just look into all the words for different and deeper meanings. Look at the whole verse and the sum of its meaning rather than the individual words
Yes, the death of the Nightingale in the poem "The Frog and the Nightingale" by Vikram Seth is inevitable because of the demands placed on her by the cunning frog, leading to her eventual exhaustion and demise.
The frog in the poem is called as loon because it has gone crazy by the song of the nightingale . He thinks that his usual place is captured by the nightingale & is weeping like the huge water bird. That is why he wants the nightingale to leave him alone and later kills it
because the frog wants to get some food but the people won't give the frog some food.
Yes, the title "Frog and Nightingale" is appropriate as it hints at the central characters in the poem and the interaction between them. It sets up the expectation for a tale involving both the frog and the nightingale.
In the poem "The Frog and the Nightingale" by Vikram Seth, the frog's demise can be seen as justified because the nightingale's talent was manipulated and exploited by the frog. The frog capitalized on the nightingale's insecurity and eventually caused her downfall through his greed and deceit. The poem serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of allowing others to take advantage of one's talents.
In the poem "The Frog and the Nightingale," the nightingale is portrayed as naive, trusting, and easily influenced. She is eager to please others, which ultimately leads to her downfall when she sacrifices her own health and well-being for the sake of the frog's selfish demands. The nightingale's character highlights the dangers of falling prey to manipulation and losing one's true self in the pursuit of external validation.
In the poem "The Frog and the Nightingale" by Vikram Seth, the frog introduced himself as "Admiral" in a loud and boastful manner. He claimed to possess a loud and booming voice which he believed was perfect and superior to everyone else's.
personification
plz give dialoge
"The Frog and the Nightingale" by Vikram Seth is a satirical poem that explores the themes of exploitation and manipulation in the entertainment industry through the story of a frog and a nightingale. The poem sheds light on how talent can be taken advantage of, while also highlighting the importance of self-worth and standing up against oppression. The presentation of this poem can include analyzing the characters, themes, and literary devices used by the poet to convey his message effectively.
For: The frog in the poem "The Frog and the Nightingale" should be considered a tragic hero. Despite his initial arrogance and selfishness, the frog's downfall and eventual demise serve as a cautionary tale against the toxicity of unchecked pride and ambition. Through his character development, the frog embodies the consequences of hubris and serves as a powerful symbol of the destructive nature of fame and success. Against: The frog in the poem "The Frog and the Nightingale" should not be viewed as a tragic hero but rather as a negative portrayal of arrogance and exploitation. His manipulation and mistreatment of the nightingale for personal gain highlight the vices of greed and selfishness. The frog's lack of redemption and remorse for his actions ultimately paint him as a villainous figure rather than a sympathetic hero.
Mozart being the best music composer of all times, the frog in the poem compared himself to him. He wanted to show of to the nightingale.