The distinction between states (that is solids, liquids and gases) is based on differences in molecular interelationships
The smallest particle of matter having distinctive chemical and physiacl properties; a tiny particle
Particle that are too big (for the technology that you are working with).
This is the definition of a molecule.
By definition, a particle is a solid, so your question does not make sense.
The kinetic energy of a particle is the energy that a particle possesses due to its motion. It is calculated as one-half the mass of the particle multiplied by the square of its velocity. Mathematically, it can be represented as KE = 0.5 * m * v^2, where KE is the kinetic energy, m is the mass of the particle, and v is its velocity.
Particle size is another name for the term grain size.
In the scientific definition of work, magnetic and electric fields can do work on charged particles that are moving through them. The work done is based on the force exerted by the field on the particle and the distance over which the particle is displaced.
Particle motion refers to the movement of individual particles in a substance or medium, such as the movement of atoms or molecules in a gas or liquid. It can also refer to the motion of subatomic particles in nuclear reactions or the movement of particles in response to external forces like electromagnetic fields.
The smallest particle that can ever be found, it cannot be broken down in to anything smaller
It is simply type of small addition of other foreign particle's with high energy of radiation...
There is no such thing or word as a 'netron'.You possibly mis-spelled 'neutron' which is an elementary particle with no electrical charge.
By definition a massless particle has no rest mass therefore it can not take up any spacial volume. I think the confusion lies with calling something that is massless, a particle. This is because as soon as we hear particle we think "object" and objects have definite mass and volume. A photon is massless and sometimes people may refer to it as a particle of light. But in fact that is sort of a misnomer being that it really isn't a particle, though it has particle-like properties. If something is massless theorists have said that the object does not interact with the Higgs field, though gravitational effects are still felt by the photon, example: gravitational lensing.