answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

language purists

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1d ago

Prescriptive linguists believed that language change was the result of language corruption. They aimed to uphold the "correct" usage of language by prescribing language rules and norms to maintain linguistic purity. This perspective contrasts with descriptive linguistics, which observes and documents language as it naturally evolves over time.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Believed that language change was the result of language corruption?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Political Science
Related questions

What may result in language change?

Confused people.


What were Walter Rauschenbusch's ideas about Social Gospel and Progressive movement?

Rauschenbusch believed that evil in the world was a result of big bodies like political institutions and that evil in individuals came about as a result of this. He believed that a way to combat this was to destroy political corruption which was a major focus of the Progressive movement.


What are three reasons that places sometimes change names?

Places can change names as a result of a political upheaval; they can also change if they are believed to have racial or ethnic connotations.


What is the connection between language and culture?

Language is a key component of culture as it shapes how people communicate, express ideas, and pass down traditions. Different languages often reflect the values, beliefs, and social norms of a particular culture, influencing how individuals perceive the world around them and interact with one another. Language also serves as a medium for preserving cultural heritage and identity.


What are the manner in which a society may collapse as a result of corruption?

Financial collapse is the primary form of collapse due to corruption.


How did the people's thinking about their government change?

People believed that the government existed as the result of an agreement between the people and their leaders.


As a result of the Enlightenment how did the people's thinking of their government change?

They believed an agreement must exist between the people and their leaders


As result of the enlightenment how did the people's thinking about their government change?

They believed an agreement must exist between the people and their leaders


How did people's thinking about the government change as a result of the enlightenment?

They believed an agreement must exist between the people and their leaders


As the result of the enlightenment how did people's thinking about their government change?

They believed an agreement must exist between the people and their leaders


What is Effects?

Effect is something that is produce by a cause or the result of an action.


How did the enlightenment change peoples thinking about the government?

People believed that the government existed as the result of an agreement between the people and their leaders.