answersLogoWhite

0

It depends on the circumstances of the letter and the historical event under investigation. A primary source is anything produced at the time and place of the historical event under investigation. To give an example of how the same letter may be a primary or a secondary source, let's presume that a letter was written by an American woman, who is a Professor, to her friend in 1922 about the Ancient Athenian government system. If the 'event' under study is the Ancient Athenian government system, then this letter is a secondary source since it was not produced at that time and place. However, if the study is modern women's interpretation of Ancient Greek politics or if it is a biography of this female Professor then it is a primary source since it is produced at the time and place of the event.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Political Science

Is politics by aristotale primary source or secondary source?

Aristotle's work on politics would be considered a primary source since he is the original author of the information. It provides firsthand accounts and interpretations of political theories and systems during his time.


What do primary sources include?

Primary sources are the documents themselves. If you want to study the constitution you could read the constitution (primary source) or you could read a scholarly essay about the constitution (secondary source). It is important to research using primary sources because the middle man in the secondary source could be biased or inaccurate. Preservation of primary sources allows for the constant reevaluation of current interpretations present in secondary sources.


The text of Diary of Bennet H Barrow is what type of primary source?

The text of Diary of Bennet H. Barrow is a type of primary source known as a personal diary or journal. It provides firsthand accounts and insights into the daily life, thoughts, and experiences of the author, making it a valuable historical document.


How historian using the thinking skill of primary source analysis might?

Historians analyze primary sources by evaluating their credibility, context, and purpose to draw conclusions about the past. They examine the source's biases, author's perspective, and possible motivations to understand the historical events more accurately. By critically assessing primary sources, historians can reconstruct the past more effectively and provide a more nuanced interpretation of historical events.


Why would a political scientist wish consult multiple sources of information on a topic?

to corroborate a given primary source's claim about an event