Factors that led to graft and corrupt practices in the church and civil government include lack of transparency, weak oversight mechanisms, power dynamics, and personal greed among individuals in positions of authority. Additionally, historical contexts such as feudalism and colonialism may have also contributed to the prevalence of corruption in these institutions.
There have always been individuals in the Church who have been corrupt as every single individual who ever lived, saving Our Blessed Lord, and His Mother, have been sinners. The Church, however, is the Body of Christ, and Our Blessed Lord promised the Holy Spirit to guide Her until the end of the world. The Catholic Church is incapable of being corrupt, although individuals within her, including Popes, may be. To say that the Church was corrupt is to say that Our Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, was corrupt, which is nonsense. The vast majority of corrupt individuals during the Renaissance was neither more nor less than at any other time in history, it has just gotten a lot more press because heretics used corrupt individuals as an excuse to leave the Church and start their own religions. The Catholic Church, however, was never corrupt, and could never be.
Corrupt officialdom refers to a situation where government officials or authorities misuse their power for personal gain or engage in unethical and illegal activities. This can include bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, and other forms of corruption that undermine the public's trust in the government and its institutions.
It is impossible to answer without bias, because most churches have varying degrees of influence in their respective countries, and in the world. The Roman Catholic Church as a whole, with its 2000-year history, has surely had more instances of wrongdoing or individual misdeeds than any other church, and could have been considered corrupt for its political actions in Europe.
A corrupt cardinal is a high-ranking official in the Catholic Church who is involved in unethical or illegal activities, such as embezzlement, bribery, or abuse of power. This goes against the principles of integrity and morality expected of clergy members within the Church.
The Catholic Church is not corrupt. However, as with any human institution, there are a number of corrupt individuals in the Church, especially in the Roman Curia. Some of the characters in the movie The God Father were based on actual persons. Pope Benedict tried hard to clean up the corruption but his age left him without the stamina to do the job. We all pray that Francis is up to the challenge. Satan has been trying to destroy the Church since it was founded and what better place to operate than in the Vatican itself.
Martin Luther
Because they were corrupt and did not follow the teaching of the bible.
The people were protesting some corrupt practices in the Catholic Church.
The Church did not change any of its doctrines during the Reformation. It did change, or attempt to change, some of the corrupt practices and behaviors that had crept into the Church over the years.
Respond to the calls coming from within the Catholic Church from people like Martin Lutfur (once a Friar) and Erasmus to reform the church from within by abolishing corrupt practices.
There have always been individuals in the Church who have been corrupt as every single individual who ever lived, saving Our Blessed Lord, and His Mother, have been sinners. The Church, however, is the Body of Christ, and Our Blessed Lord promised the Holy Spirit to guide Her until the end of the world. The Catholic Church is incapable of being corrupt, although individuals within her, including Popes, may be. To say that the Church was corrupt is to say that Our Blessed Lord, Jesus Christ, was corrupt, which is nonsense. The vast majority of corrupt individuals during the Renaissance was neither more nor less than at any other time in history, it has just gotten a lot more press because heretics used corrupt individuals as an excuse to leave the Church and start their own religions. The Catholic Church, however, was never corrupt, and could never be.
Martin Luther. He did not have to challenge the Catholic Church. However, he did so, due to his belief that some of its practices were corrupt (e.g. the sale of indulgences).
No government has the right to be involved in church affairs. They should at all times remain independent of each other. Government is politics and the church should not be involved in politics. Evidences that this sort of relationship does not work can be seen in communistic countries. All governments are corrupt, churches should be above corruption.
The Puritans aimed to reform the Church of England from within, while the Separatists wanted complete separation from the church. The Puritans believed in purifying the church of what they saw as corrupt practices, while the Separatists believed in forming their own independent congregations outside the established church structure.
Corrupt officialdom refers to a situation where government officials or authorities misuse their power for personal gain or engage in unethical and illegal activities. This can include bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, and other forms of corruption that undermine the public's trust in the government and its institutions.
One humanist priest who criticized corrupt popes and monks was Martin Luther. He was a key figure in the Protestant Reformation and spoke out against practices such as the selling of indulgences by the Catholic Church.
I don't think that the experience of discourse was part of the colloquy. But no, the conversion experience was not at the heart of the Puritans' objection to the C of E. Puritans objected to many C of E practices including, among other things, clerical dress and church government.