answersLogoWhite

0

According to the Norwegian political scientist Xyvind Xsterud, the difference between a unitary and a federal state is not that one is more decentralized than the other, but that the former is decentralized through legislation whereas the latter is decentralized by constitution. In a federation, certain matters are thus constitutionally devolved to local units, and the central government cannot unilaterally revoke this decentralization, as it can in a unitary state.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Political Science

Who holds most power in an unitary government?

The national government holds all the power in a unitary government, as opposed to a federal systems as seen in the United States where power is fragmented between the federal, state and local levels.


Does a unitary system share power with the national government?

A Unitary government IS the national government. A Unitary governmental system describes a Nation-State that consolidates all political authority in the national government.An example of a Unitary government is the parliament/prime minister of England.


What is unitary state?

A unitary state is a system of government where most or all of the governing power is held by a single, central government authority. This centralized government typically delegates limited powers to lower levels of government such as states or provinces, but retains the ultimate authority. Examples of unitary states include France and Japan.


Why power is concentrated in a central government in unitary state?

By definition, a unitary state is one in which significant and subordinate levels of government, as in federal states, do not exist, so power can either only be concentrated at the central level or via powers given from that government to departments or municipalities.


Does the unitary form of government has the capability to be more corrupt than federal form of government?

Even more so in fact. The existence of a single political arm would allow for heavy misuse of the ability to appoint individuals to office. There would not be checks and balances that our government permits to prevent such abuses