Sparta was cool. they killed people. Athens was a bunch of panzies.
While they did kill people, they also were the first direct democracy.
^^ Not entirely helpful, but sadly true.
In Sparta they had what we'd call a Constitutional Monarchy. This means that the King of Sparta would basically be a figure-head for the people to rally around; he didn't have any real power (except in wars I think).
Athens however was the origins of Democracy. In Athens though they practised Direct Democracy, which is the citizens of Athens going and voting on particular issues themselves instead of having MPs, or Senators doing it for them.
In most countries that have a Democracy, there is a Representative Democracy which involves voting a person to represent you in the government/parliament/senate.
So...
Sparta = Constitutional Monarchy
Athens = Direct Democracy
You you need to answer this prompt. It requires a written reply from you and not us. We don't do homework. I suggest you do a Venn diagram to sort out the information you need for your homework.
The political system in some countries is increasingly socialist. The US adopted a political system in which the legislative and executive branches are separate.
A two-party system is a political system where two major parties dominate the political landscape and typically compete for power. In contrast, a multi-party system is a political system where multiple parties compete for power and representation, leading to a more diverse political landscape and potentially requiring coalition governments to govern effectively.
Sparta focused on military training and discipline to improve their city-state. They also implemented a strict social hierarchy and emphasized physical fitness to create a strong and loyal citizenry. Additionally, Sparta established a unique system of government with dual kings and an assembly to make decisions.
Ancient Athens is often considered to have had one of the most direct forms of democracy in history. In Athens, citizens had the opportunity to vote on laws and policies directly in large assemblies. Their system of government allowed for more widespread citizen participation compared to other ancient civilizations.
balls
Foreign travelers introduced new philosophies.
If you are talking about Cities States and the Peloponnesian War is mainly because half of the states were in ally with Sparta and the other half were allies with Athens, plus some other neutral states. Sparta and Athens were the two dominant states back then, so when Athens started to gain more and more power, Sparta didn't like that. The possible reason why Sparta and Athens were in dispute all the time might be the governmental system, Sparta had an oligarchic system, and Athens a democratic system. Was like nowadays political parties.
Athens was enemies with Sparta and Sparta was enemies with Athens
Sparta full-time. Athens part-time.
Foreign travelers introduced new philosophies.
Sparta because they did not have as much freedom as Athens.
No. The modern political system Sparta was closest to is Monarchy.
They both had different political views
The Peloponnesian Peninsula separates Athens and Sparta in ancient Greece. This geographic feature was a significant factor in their rivalry and differences in culture and political systems.
Athena
Athens is often considered better than Sparta because of its focus on culture, philosophy, and democracy. Athens was a center of arts, education, and intellectual pursuits, while Sparta was primarily a militaristic society. Additionally, Athens gave its citizens more freedom and opportunities for political participation compared to the strict and rigid society of Sparta.