Political science is a cesspool inhabited by a group of infernal miscreants:
1. Political theorists, who just make ^@$%.
2. Substantive researchers, who apply made-up %@.
3. Methodologists and formal theorists, who justify made-up %@^#.
These maniacal villains, conveniently gathered into one floor of one building of each aptly-named "department of Political Science", held a convention thousands of years ago in a determined effort to screw-up your life.
Anyone in politics, since it is, clearly, only called a science to make you take their %$ seriously, can tell you that it never ends well. It is filled with people, and the lives of people are generally solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short. And this is what the professors plan to make of you.
First, they lure you in with the illusions of changing the world, learning about society, easy marks, and/or not having to do mathematics. They feed you these lies in order to make a large, quick, and easily-earned payoff from your tuition fees.1 In order to give you the idea of doing something vaguely applicable to the real world, you are to study a series of virtually completely unrelated courses, with little-to-no internal cohesion, and demonstrate your proficiency in their one paper hypotheses with terrible methodologies by concocting further lies, usually in the form of a paper or exam.2 Of course, by the end of that term you recall nothing of what you learned, but this does not bother you, since the goal of society is to get a degree to show-off, not learn anything in particular.
Through completing all of this work, which, to no avail, is neither thoroughly scientific nor particularly useful, you earn a wondrous B.A. in political science. Congratulations, old sport! But... wait? What's that, my undergraduate degree? You can't earn me any jobs since political science has no positions unless you become a professor? Well, then, I guess I'll just have to become a professor!3
So, after working valiantly and forgetting everything you ever knew, it turns out that the only way to make it worthwhile is to teach it. Thus the cabal of evil professors wins out; by forcing you to take graduate school in it and thereby teach, they lure you into their clutches to continue the dreadful cycle all over again. To provide funding for this unfortunate result, they have created academic journals, such as Politics or Political Economy, to build-up their street cred and milk the government for additional funding.
In conclusion, a succinct answer to your question would be something like: "Political science is a massive conspiracy designed to ruin your life." Except I cannot say that, else I will be ruined by the powers that be.4 Therefore, I implore you to consider pursuing political science as both a useful, and valuable subfield to pursue your own academic interests. The best of luck to you, and, if you take my academic job offer, I will kill you.
_______________________________________________________________
Footnotes
1 - And we know the golden rule for any arts sub-field is that, "those who cannot do mathematics do arts." This holds for political science.
2 - Papers in political science usually consist of three parts: 1. procrastination of said paper until the night of its due date; 2. constructing an arbitrary, poorly-worded, and difficult-to-argue thesis; 3. subsequently praying to your selected deity (or lack thereof) that the professor will pass it. Not that he marks it anyway, since that's what graduate students are for.
3 - If the bitter melancholy of the fact that the only truly political science-based jobs are teaching political science to other people, then you are likely too dumb for even this discipline. To learn more about sarcasm, consider switching to English.
4 - And I would like to thank the man or, in this case, my host institution for its generous donation of funding to the furtherance of my academic career in this field to continue the road to freedom from ignorance. And ramen. I can't wait to stop eating that &$#@.
Political science is considered a social science rather than a pure science. While it follows systematic methods of research and analysis to study political behavior, institutions, and processes, it is not based on natural laws like pure sciences. Instead, political science deals with human behavior and societal dynamics, which are influenced by various factors making it a social science.
There is a disagreement in the philosophy of science as to whether values should play a role in science and, if so, to what degree. Firstly, it should be said that political science is not value free, and to make it so would largely be impossible due to the difficulty of separating facts from values in many political systems that are heavily loaded and understood by such values. Secondly, values can be useful when applied to goals we desire from using political science, and so having no values may be detrimental to its utility. Finally, I believe that, as a science, political science should still attempt to isolate values where possible and not use them where they are not important given how contentious and difficult to measure they are.
Yes, you can pursue a degree in psychology first and then a degree in political science. However, keep in mind that each program will have its own set of prerequisites, so it is important to plan your course schedule accordingly. Additionally, consider how the skills and knowledge gained in psychology can complement your studies in political science.
The quote is attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville, a 19th-century French political thinker and historian. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of history and political science, suggesting that a deep understanding of one requires an understanding of the other in order to derive meaningful insights and analysis.
Political science is related to history as it relies on the study of past political events and structures to understand how political systems evolve over time. By analyzing historical events, political scientists can identify patterns, trace the roots of contemporary political issues, and make predictions about future developments. History provides a context for understanding political institutions, ideologies, and behaviors, allowing political scientists to draw insights and lessons from the past.
they are so bad
its not bad who said it was bad goh u suck person "!!!!!!!! (whop has the ?s!!!!! gosh!
the tittle political science is alone misleading so the term political science is not a science but not an art as well as dividion
I don't think so! Long before there were computers (and computer science), there were brilliant physics and engineering students and they obviously were good at math.
I don't think so! Long before there were computers (and computer science), there were brilliant physics and engineering students and they obviously were good at math.
Indians suck really bad this year because they are bithes or slaves to Chinese people
They suck so bad since Brett probably had that girl suck him and they lost to the packers and Adam is a weiny.
it didn't.
They are smelly.
You could take the worst thing in the world (the oilers lol) and times it by 1,000,000,000,000 so yah they suck bad as you can see
well i say that all the time so it is no
Tom Cruise.