I think you want me to talk about empires for like history so here it goes.
If you have a huge empire it is hard to keep as it is further away, it costs more money, is harder to run and keep organised and people further away are different to you than someone close so will probably not want to be ruled by you.
Like if you are trying to take the place over you will have to send in your army and this will be harder if the place is further away rather than being close to you (it might cost a lot of money transporting people and weapons for example). Also people may be different so they could be harder to conquer like they might know things that you don't so it could be harder to defeat them. If you are trying to conquer a new place you won't know a lot about it for example.
I hope I gave you the right sort of answer.
A Kakistocracy is a government that is run by the least qualified or least prinicipled people. One might make the argument that the United States is a Kakistocracy.
I think we could have instigated some things. I think that we also might have sold them the weapons so; we might be the most corrupt and dishonest country in the world. At least we are the the most barbaric country in the world those are the other countries just as afghanistan.
When something "might sound crass," it means it could be perceived as rude, vulgar, or insensitive. It suggests that the statement or action might not be socially acceptable or may offend others.
A loyalist might have referred to a patriot gathering or committee as "rebel" or "traitorous."
It is unclear who "they" refers to, but individuals might disapprove of various things such as unethical behavior, inappropriate actions, or decisions that go against their beliefs or values. Understanding the specific context would help identify what "they" might disapprove of.
i just came here for an answer
In pre-mechanical transport era, communication and movement of armies was slow and difficult. So they split the Empire into four to give two emperors and two caesars more manageable quotas.
Alexander first had to conquer the empire to rule it. By the time he had finished the conquest, he died. So we would have to imagine what he might have done if he had lived to fully implement the areas he had already begun - to Hellenise the empire as a civilising influence on society.
Answer 1The Inca Empire consisted of a great number of different population groups. The ruling Incas had no subgroups, but the Empire was awash with different cultures, religions and languages. Even the ruling Incas themselves might be constituted of different population groups, but we don't know: they were diligent record-keepers, but their written records have so far resisted deciphering. And the Spaniards also destroyed a lot of the Inca records.___________________________________________________Answer 2The fact that the Incas increased their empire through wars, the conquest of different peoples and cultures was very common. As pointed out, the ruling classes did try and stay "pure." But even the ruling classes were rife with jealousies and power hungry people.
it might change by the french ruling the country
By the ruling
By the ruling
The Inca Empire might have thought of spainards character as; frivolous, wealthy, well to do.
In pre-mechanical transport era, communication and movement of armies was slow and difficult. So they split the Empire into four to give two emperors and two caesars more manageable quotas.
If by opposite, you mean the country ruling the colony, the nation that is the centre of the empire, then you might say overlord, imperial nation, ruler, governing state, or perhaps mother country or homeland, depending on the relationship between colony and ruler.
I'm not sure you phrased that correctly. You might be thinking of a negative number, which is said to be smaller when it's larger and larger when it's smaller.
it would be difficult beacause they didnt know how to swim