In general, it is a good idea to study the things that interest you. I see little advantage in studying political science if the subject does not interest you. Find something more interesting to study.
There is a disagreement in the philosophy of science as to whether values should play a role in science and, if so, to what degree. Firstly, it should be said that political science is not value free, and to make it so would largely be impossible due to the difficulty of separating facts from values in many political systems that are heavily loaded and understood by such values. Secondly, values can be useful when applied to goals we desire from using political science, and so having no values may be detrimental to its utility. Finally, I believe that, as a science, political science should still attempt to isolate values where possible and not use them where they are not important given how contentious and difficult to measure they are.
Political thought refers to the ideas and theories that influence political systems and behaviors, while political science is the systematic study of politics and government. Political thought provides the theoretical framework for political science research and analysis, shaping the questions asked and methodologies used in the discipline. In turn, political science applies empirical methods to study political phenomena and test the validity of political thought.
political thoughts may be irregular regarding with their places and rulers who makes the thoughts but political science should be an uniform one for the world...
The idea that political science is a moral science can be credited to the German philosopher Immanuel Kant. Kant believed that political theory should be based on moral principles and that the purpose of politics is to promote the greater good for society.
As philosophy seeks to establish the ethics of a particular subject, it deals with what should be,---sustainably idealistic in a given situation.Political philosophy,thus,seeks to underline the moral discipline that politics has to abide by in a sustainable way. Science,on the contrary,seeks to prove a thing by experiments and analyses and declare it established,-----the pursuit having nothing to do with the ideal, as such. Political science is,therefore, concerned about the proved growth of the polity without having to bother about its evolution in the desired idealistic direction. The difference betwen the two may be summed up as:the former in establishing a theory looks to 'what should be', and , the latter to 'what is'.
It is probably better just to get a straightup bachelor's of law.
No, since political science is not a proper noun.
Science is interesting, therefore, if you learn about it, you should be interested by it. Only people who have failed to understand science, usually as a result of a haphazard approach that did not prepare them to understand material in a logical sequence, will then be uninterested in the subject.
The most commonly used citation style for political science research papers is the American Political Science Association (APSA) style.
derfinetly science
Something you are interested in, or can get interested in. Something you can complete in the time allowed. Something you can be proud of, even if it is an experiment that fails. Science is about finding where what we "know", fails.
John S. Nelson has written: 'What Should Political Theory Be Now ? (Suny Series in Political Theory)' 'Tradition, Interpretation, and Science: Political Theory in the American Academy (Suny Series in Politicsl Theory : Contemporary Issues)' 'Tropes of politics' -- subject(s): Political aspects, Political aspects of Rhetoric, Political science, Rhetoric 'Together in His name'
There is a disagreement in the philosophy of science as to whether values should play a role in science and, if so, to what degree. Firstly, it should be said that political science is not value free, and to make it so would largely be impossible due to the difficulty of separating facts from values in many political systems that are heavily loaded and understood by such values. Secondly, values can be useful when applied to goals we desire from using political science, and so having no values may be detrimental to its utility. Finally, I believe that, as a science, political science should still attempt to isolate values where possible and not use them where they are not important given how contentious and difficult to measure they are.
political science
to take up law
You do not captitalize "science", but you should capitalize when it's in the form of "Science 30".
What ever you are interested in like if u like Science or Religion then make sure to try to take the harder classes of that subject