0
Strictly speaking, NO, but for most democracies, divisions are inherent. You can have a non-divided democracy, it is simply very unlikely that such will occur. The country that has come the closest to this is Japan, which has effectively had one-party rule since liberal democracy was introduced in 1945 because of the cultural preference for "harmony" and "non-dissent".
The reason why it is practically impossible for Western democracies to be non-divided is that Western society promotes individualism and individualism makes people seek to promote their own benefits. This leads to political parties where different groups with different desires and schema for improving society come into existence. The contests between political parties make the very divisions common to Western democracy,
What else can I help you with?
Why does airbag light stay on Dodge Intrepid 1994?
There is a problem with the SRS. Due to the inherent danger of working on the system, I recommend you take it to a professional for repair.There is a problem with the SRS. Due to the inherent danger of working on the system, I recommend you take it to a professional for repair.
How did Nelson Mandela begin working for democracy?
Nelson Mandela started working for democracy while he was studying to be a lawyer he joined ANC (african national congress)
The unfolding of democracy in the new South Africa?
essay on the unfolding of democracy in the new south africa
How does the democracy leader get his position?
He gets it by working hard.
What is the motto of Alliance for Democracy UK?
Alliance for Democracy - UK -'s motto is 'Working together for the people the politicians forgot'.
How do you replace airbags on Honda Accord?
You don't. Working on the SRS is not a DIY repair. Due to the inherent danger of working on this system, this should be done by a professional.
What is a drawback to a direct democracy?
One inherent problem in direct democracy is tabulating the votes of the entire populace. There is no way to have a direct democracy without having a mechanism to tabulate and measure the votes.
Why might Leonard believe that democracy would inevitably degenerate into tumult violence and anarchy?
Leonard might believe that democracy could degenerate into tumult, violence, and anarchy due to the inherent conflicts of interest among diverse groups within society, leading to polarization and strife. The competition for power and resources can foster division and hostility, undermining social cohesion. Additionally, he may argue that the potential for populism and demagoguery in democratic systems can exploit these divisions, inciting chaos and undermining established norms and institutions. Thus, he sees democracy as vulnerable to collapse under the weight of its own contradictions.
Chinese students working for democracy were killed by their government at?
Tiananmen SquareTiananmen Square
The emergence of Parliament was important because?
It was the first example of working democracy in history.
Where were Chinese students working for democracy killed by their government?
I'm pretty sure it never happened, or else someone would've answered this. Democracy's terrible anyways.
How did Karl Marx define democracy?
Karl Marx viewed democracy as a tool used by the ruling capitalist class to maintain their power and serve their interests. He believed that true democracy can only be achieved through the liberation of the working class from capitalist exploitation, leading to a more equitable and just society. Marx saw democracy as a way to ensure that the working class had a voice and power in shaping society.
