Yes, third parties in politics are often short-lived due to various factors, including a lack of funding, limited media exposure, and challenges in gaining ballot access. They frequently struggle to build a broad base of support and can be overshadowed by the dominant two-party system. Additionally, many voters may perceive them as "spoilers" in elections, leading to a reluctance to support them. As a result, many third parties dissolve or merge with larger parties over time.
No. Third parties are minor parties , although at times they have split the votes in an important way .
shortlived
third parties often have promoted ideas that were at firts unpopular or hotly debated
third parties are also called minor parties
Some third-party goals eventually become planks in the platforms of the major parties
third parties often are assosiated but not limited to the company they advertise on the building,website,bus,ect. they are also a related competetor or an assosiate of the company/buissness
Eucalyptus trees are relatively shortlived but they very often sprout again from the stump.
The plural of third party is third parties.
ephemeral
pp
All third parties share the common characteristic of being independent entities that provide services, support, or mediation between two primary parties in a transaction or agreement. They facilitate communication, negotiation, or resolution of disputes, aiming to enhance the relationship or outcome for the involved parties. Additionally, third parties often bring expertise or resources that neither of the primary parties possesses.
Third parties are often referred to as minor parties because they have less influence, resources, and representation compared to the two major political parties in a given country. These parties typically struggle to gain significant electoral support and face obstacles in achieving political power.