No. From the very start there were two sides in government. In 1789 when Washington took office there were men who were federalist and others who were antifederalist. They hadn't formed into political parties yet, but they soon would as time wore on. By the 1860's the Republican and Democratic parties were in full force. Lincoln was the first Republican president and since then the party has changed through the centuries.
The worst idea ever. In a one party system of government the people would only have one party to choose from. Say like if there were no republicans and only democrats ran for office, that would be a one party system.
A Monarchy Government
A "gridlocked" government.
Single-party rule
The era of one-party domination that began in 1968 was different from past eras of one-party domination because The Democrats ruled the South where as the Republicans dominated the Northern U.S. states.
When one party controls the House and the other controls the Senate it is called divided government.
A party in government consists of all of the elected and appointed officials who identify with a party.
No such bill was ever produced by the U.S. government.
A divided party government occurs when one party is in the presidency and the other controls one or both chambers of Congress. Because in a divided government one party can check the other's agenda, it is exceedingly difficult for a party to carry out its policies. Divided party governments in modern times have affected voter behaviors. The inability of a party to bring its promises to fruition has contributed to voter disillusionment in the democratic system, decreasing trust and confidence in government.
Yes, from a practical standpoint at the present time. No third party candidate has ever won, but there is no legal reason why it could not happen. In the past there have been some Congressmen elected from minor parties and minor party candidates have won some electoral votes in the past.
no one
democracies