There is no difference. Look up the definition of the word euphemism.
No he was a freedom fighter
a terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.
are you serious? well if you've learnt at school Gandhi is far from a terrorists in fact he was killed by an extremist, but to answer you question, he was a freedom -fighter
Krantikari
He would be either a terrorist or a freedom-fighter, depending whether you were on his side.
He was a filipino freedom fighter
yes, he is freedom fighter
yes.he was a freedom fighter.
He was a freedom fighter to his people.
It all depends on particular points of view. As they say: "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."
Generally speaking, these days, it's "Terrorism". Of course it's well known that one man's terrorist is anothe rman's freedom fighter. Who is the judge?
never, he attacked us because we hit him first. in 1991, we invaded saudi arabia and illegaly started stealing oil and killing innocent muslims. WHAT AMERICA CALLS A TERRORIST IS ACTUALLY A FREEDOM FIGHTER!