He compares the people of the Philippines to children who are governed without consent
He pointed out that the United States already does this with Native Americans.
He pointed out that the United States already does this with Native Americans. He also compared the people in the Philippines to children, who are governed without consent.
Beveridge addresses the charge of governing people without their consent by emphasizing the importance of the social contract and the role of government in ensuring the common good. He argues that legitimate authority arises from the consent of the governed, and that when a government fails to represent the people's interests, it loses its moral justification to rule. Beveridge suggests that active engagement and participation in governance are essential for maintaining legitimacy and accountability. Thus, he upholds the principle that consent is foundational to the ethical exercise of political power.
Beveridge addresses the charge that governing people without their consent is wrong by emphasizing the importance of the greater good and the necessity of governance for social order and stability. He argues that certain circumstances, such as war or crisis, may justify overriding individual consent for the collective benefit. Furthermore, he posits that consent is often implicit in the social contract, where citizens accept governance in exchange for protection and services. Ultimately, Beveridge suggests that the moral imperative of ensuring the welfare of the community can supersede individual consent in specific situations.
Beveridge argues that governing people without their consent undermines the legitimacy of authority and violates democratic principles. He emphasizes that true governance should be based on the consent of the governed, as it fosters accountability and respect for individual rights. Without consent, the governing body risks alienating its citizens and can lead to unrest or rebellion. Ultimately, Beveridge advocates for participatory governance as essential for maintaining social cohesion and political stability.
Beveridge said that some people were not capable of self-government.He pointed out that the US continues to do this with Native Americans, although they have their own local government powers.He points out that the United States already does this with Native Americans.He says that some people are not capable of self-government.He compares the with the people of the Philippines to children, who are governed without consent.
(apex) Answer: He says some people are not capable of self-government.
Well, isn't that an interesting question. Albert Beveridge once said, "Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed." This means that it's important for leaders to have the support and approval of the people they govern in order to be fair and effective. Remember, it's all about working together and listening to each other with kindness and understanding.
To provide a concise answer about how Beveridge addresses a specific charge, I would need more context regarding which charge you're referring to. Beveridge's responses can vary based on the topic, whether it pertains to social policy, economic theory, or another area. Please provide additional details for a more accurate response.
No, the Revolution got rid of the "monarchy", or Czars and Czarinas, and put the "people" in charge of governing the country.
He says that some people are not capable of self-government and pointed out that the United States already does it with Native Americans.