Political parties allow people to vote in representatives that represent their ideas and what they believe is right for the nation in Congress and in the Presidency.
A direct democracy is similar to a representative democracy in that both systems enable citizens to participate in the political process and influence decision-making. However, in a direct democracy, individuals vote directly on laws and policies, while in a representative democracy, they elect representatives to make those decisions on their behalf. Both systems value the principle of popular sovereignty, where the authority of the government derives from the consent of the governed. Ultimately, they aim to reflect the will of the people, albeit through different mechanisms.
i disagree
I wish I knew I'm trying to figure it out too:(
developed more democratic ways to choose candidates for president.
In a direct democracy the people act as decision makers on all major issues. This can be at the national level or the village level. Everything of importance is voted on by all of the people. In a representative democracy the people vote on representatives who act on their behalf either leading on issues or following the feelings of the people. There are problems with both approaches. A direct democracy must rely on someone to properly phrase the issue before the community. This phrasing is very important and people will not agree on the wording. A representative democracy suffers from the problem of the representatives following their own insights and intuition on topics versus voting for the precieved will of the people. Most units of government operate under some form of representative democracy.
American political dogma often confuses socialism with social-democratic principles. Social democratic parties such as the New Democratic Party in Canada and the Labour Party in the United Kingdom play an important role in those polities. These parties reflect left-leaning ideologies, but in the context of liberal democracy, whereas true socialism is an aspect of totalitarianism.
NO
In Athens the citizens met in fortnightly assembly and made decisions which the Council implemented between meetings. In the Us, the citizens elect congressmen, who meet in Washington, and follow partly lines which do not necessarily reflect the wishes of the citizens who elected them.
In Athens the citizens met in fortnightly assembly and made decisions which the Council implemented between meetings. In the Us, the citizens elect congressmen, who meet in Washington, and follow partly lines which do not necessarily reflect the wishes of the citizens who elected them.
In Athens the citizens met in fortnightly assembly and made decisions which the Council implemented between meetings. In the Us, the citizens elect congressmen, who meet in Washington, and follow partly lines which do not necessarily reflect the wishes of the citizens who elected them.
The media typically color maps red and blue to reflect the different US political parties. Blue is for the Democrats and red for Republicans.
Democraft. (Modern Republicans). Political parties have made a 180 degree turn from that period. Modern Democrats reflect past Republicans as modern Republicans reflect past Democrats. So if slaves still existed today Fox News would be pro-slavery and MSNBC would be pro-abolition if you catch my drift.