It can be argued that pressure groups are undemocratic, and bad for democracy, in many ways. One reason why they can be viewed as being bad for democracy is because they are generally undemocratic in organisation. This means that they have no real authority with which to fight their cause, since they are unelected. The membership of pressure groups is also generally from the middle classes and so is not representative of the population. Another reason for why pressure groups could be bad for democracy is that there is unequal distribution of resources between groups, and unequal influence between different groups. This means that groups with more money will be more likely to be successful, because they are better able to promote their cause. Some powerful insider pressure groups could remove power from democratically elected governments as they attempt to pursue their own personal cause. Pressure groups also sometimes have unrealistic aims and this can lead the electorate to feel that the government are not handling situations correctly. Certain outsider pressure groups may choose to opperate illegally and so can undermine and attack the government, and so attack the political and democratic authority which the government posseses.
by forcing the goverment to do as the people want......BASTERDS
Both interest groups and pressure groups are like the arterial network giving feedback to policies of government. they infact are a basis of 'popular participation' in a democracy.
Yes of course it is impossible. How will be instrests of the common man will be articulated if there will be no functional political parties and pressure groups in democracy. If there will be no functional politicalk party then a particular party which has his government will act as a dictator.
that would be democracy; under democracy people are allowed to from different groups.
Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues in a representative democracy, and citizens vote on the issues in a direct democracy. A representative democracy is modern, and a direct democracy is ancient. A representative democracy works better in large groups, and a direct democracy works better in small groups. Citizens' desires are ignored in a representative democracy, and citizens' desires have a better chance of being heard in a direct democracy
Pressure groups are the organisations or the groups that attempt to influence government policies.
Tribal and religious groups
democracy
Pressure groups influence government decisions.
direct democracy is commonly found in small groups of people.
Lise Rakner has written: 'Do interest groups matter in economic policy-making?' -- subject- s -: Economic policy, Pressure groups 'The politics of revenue mobilisation' -- subject- s -: Taxation, Fiscal policy 'Botswana, 30 years of economic growth, democracy, and aid' -- subject- s -: Economic assistance, Economic conditions, Democracy
Add smaller groups first then add the groups