Surely justice is supposed to do exactly what it says on the tin ! The shape & size of the tin doesn't matter. If it ain't right it ain't Justice. Similarly the system that any jurisdiction uses is irrelevant to the question: Justice is about fairness & balance. If the jurisdiction does not arrive at a fair & balanced result then justice is denied. I can see no other outcome irrespective of the political system. Justice is beyond political influence, if it is not then justice it is not.
Capitalism allows for more freedom for businesses than socialism does
Both socialism and capitalism involve economic systems where goods and services are produced and distributed, but they differ in terms of ownership and distribution of resources. In socialism, the means of production are owned and controlled by the state or the community, whereas in capitalism, they are owned by individuals or private companies. Additionally, both systems aim to improve the living standards of their citizens, but they have different approaches to achieving this goal.
Deng created an economy that blended socialism and capitalism.
Capitalism allows for more freedom for businesses than socialism does
Capitalism allows for more freedom for businesses than socialism does
The United States wanted to spread democracy and capitalism while the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics wanted to spread communism and socialism.
Under Socialism, the employees control the factories and there is no class system, in theory. Under capitalism, the owners control the factories and acquire wealth much more freely. Well most countries around the world are in favor of capitalism over socialism. In capiatalism store owners benefit. Its mainly those who work hard get their money. For example if you work for so many hours you get paid a certain wage because you earned it. In socialism wealth is spread to everyone. Everyone would be middle class.
Capitalism and socialism have differing views on war, often reflecting their underlying economic ideologies. Capitalism, with its focus on competition and profit, may see war as a means to secure resources, markets, and geopolitical advantage, often leading to militaristic policies. In contrast, socialism tends to emphasize social welfare and collective ownership, viewing war as a failure of diplomacy and a detriment to societal well-being. While both ideologies may justify war under certain circumstances, their motivations and implications differ significantly.
Bill
Nations differ in their systems and well-being due to a combination of historical, cultural, economic, and political factors. Economic structures, such as capitalism versus socialism, influence resource allocation and wealth distribution. Additionally, political stability, governance quality, and social policies play critical roles in shaping citizens' quality of life. Cultural values and social norms also affect societal priorities and the effectiveness of institutions, leading to varying outcomes in socio-economic development.
Robert Owen and Karl Marx differed fundamentally in their approaches to social change and economic systems. Owen advocated for utopian socialism, emphasizing cooperative communities and moral reform within capitalism to improve workers' lives. In contrast, Marx critiqued capitalism as inherently exploitative, arguing for revolutionary change through class struggle to establish a classless society. While Owen sought gradual improvement through education and cooperation, Marx believed in the necessity of a complete overthrow of the capitalist system.
What is the basic elements of the South African trial systems and how do they differ from other systems?