There are no political freedom in monarchy. It has a king who does what he wants and then there is everybody else.
as much as people in the states have
monarchy
It is not who so much as what regulates the parties. Popularity determines a policital party. It is defined as a political organization determined to gain political power.
He feared that they would weaken and destroy the Revolutionary zeal and fervor, or that they might restore the Monarchy.
Some philosophers throughout history have supported monarchy, arguing that it provides stability and unity to society. Others have criticized monarchy, believing it grants too much power to a single ruler and can lead to tyranny. Overall, views on monarchy among philosophers vary depending on their beliefs about political structure and individual rights.
None.
The Glorious Revolution occurred in 1689 and was a shift of political power from the British Monarchy to Parliament. The Monarchy remains the central focus of the government, but Parliament assume much of the power of the finances and the ability to pass laws.
The Roman republic was a republic. There was no monarchy, constitutional or otherwise.
The Parliament stripped away most of the political powers of the king, leaving him only a ceremonial role. At one point, they even abolished the monarchy and beheaded Charles I, but cooler heads eventually prevailed, and the much weakened monarchy was restored to Charles II in 1660.
A Political System Map Is Pretty Much a Map Of the World that shows all the political systems (Monarchy,Democracy,Dictatorship...) Of All Of the Countries. Often Each Political System will be given a color, and each country will be colored in based on the Political System they use. However, It is difficult to find one of these, and few are updated to modern times.
Japan doesn't have much freedom !
not much they all died