0
Dred Scott lived with Dr. Emerson at a military post in Rock Island, Illinois, in 1834.
He also lived in the federal territory of Fort Snelling (now part of Minnesota), which prohibited slavery per the Missouri Compromise of 1820, as well the unincorporated federal Wisconsin Territories, which prohibited slavery per the Northwest Ordinance.
What else can I help you with?
What did Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
What was Dred Scott argument to the supreme court?
Dred Scott argued that his time living in free territories should have made him a free man, as these territories prohibited slavery. He claimed that this should have nullified his status as a slave under the Missouri Compromise.
What did dred Scott base his claim on freedom on?
Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.
What was the issue in the dred Scott case?
He was a slave in a free state
What were the three questions the Dred Scott case had to deal with?
Dred Scott was an African-American slave who unsuccessfully sued for his family's freedom. The three questions involved in the Dred Scott case are: 1. Can a slave who has been transported to a "free state" become free? 2. Can a slave sue in Federal Court? 3. Is a slave a citizen of the United States?
What did Scott base on his claim for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
Who is a slave who sued for his freedom after being taken into free territory by owner?
Dred Scott, a slave, sued for his freedom after being taken by his owner to free territories. The landmark Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) ruled that even though Scott was in a free territory, he was not entitled to freedom because he was property under the law.
What law was found to be unconstitutional in the dred Scott desicion?
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, which designated certain territories as free and slave states, was found to be unconstitutional in the Dred Scott decision. The Supreme Court ruled that Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories.
Why did chief justice Taney think Dred Scott should not be free?
Chief Justice Taney believed that Dred Scott should not be free because he argued that African Americans, whether slave or free, were not considered citizens under the U.S. Constitution. Taney also argued that the federal government did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories, which meant that Scott's residence in a free state did not make him free.
What 3 issues did the supreme court have to decide on in the Dred Scott case?
Whether Dred Scott, as a slave, could sue in federal court. Whether residence in free territory made Scott free. Whether Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in certain territories.
Was the Chief Justice who presided at the trial of Dred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom.?
No, the Chief Justice who presided over the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney. Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom based on his residence in free territories.
What was the name of the slave that lived in a free state and sued for his freedom?
Dred Scott.
