answersLogoWhite

0

curse everyone who just says yes or no, history is a matter of opinion not fact. in my opinion he was a good king but if an other person was to come they would say otherwise.

he was a good king because he was stradegic and knew tons of ways to rule England better, however had bad advisors.

he was a bad king because he also made silly choices for examples, store horses in a church to embarass the priest and to win a siege.

after king john died it was said that two monks (not the shaolins by the way) argued over if he was a good or a bad king and in the end ripped the book in half to show that god should say what would happen to him.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?