answersLogoWhite

0

King Richard II's effectiveness as a ruler is often debated. He was known for his eloquence and patronage of the arts, but his reign was marked by political instability, poor decision-making, and a failure to manage the nobility, which ultimately led to his downfall. His inability to balance power and maintain support from key factions contributed to the perception that he was not a good king. Ultimately, opinions vary, but many historians view his reign as a cautionary tale of the dangers of autocratic rule.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

5mo ago

What else can I help you with?