Yes, a republic can exist under single-party rule, although it may compromise the fundamental principles of a republic, such as pluralism and democratic representation. In such systems, the ruling party often maintains control over political processes, limiting competition and dissent. While the government may uphold certain republican institutions, like a constitution and elected representatives, the lack of political diversity can undermine genuine democratic governance. Ultimately, while a single-party republic can function, it often faces challenges related to legitimacy and accountability.
Yes, hydrogen can exist in a solid state under specific conditions of very low temperature and high pressure.
The Bahamas U.s.a and Australia live under republic.
Another name for republic is democracy. The US is under a democracy and therefore under a republic for which it stands.
Republic under an authoritarianism regime is not a true republic. Instead, it is only a republic for a few select groups of people and not for another group.
Yes. It is also possible that only you exist and everyone and everything else is just a figment of your imagination. But, in my view, neither is anywhere near likely.
the French republic is now the fifth republic (since 1958)
tibet is under a democratic republic.
because Romans have republic government.
none
The two words are not mutually opposite. The Roman republic had an empire for a couple of hundred years. The empire continued on under a single ruler for the next few hundred years. Empire is a modern word. The words empire and emperor did not exist at the time.
Under the kings there was a rule by one person. Under the republic, the people elected their representatives and had a say in the making of the laws.Under the kings there was a rule by one person. Under the republic, the people elected their representatives and had a say in the making of the laws.Under the kings there was a rule by one person. Under the republic, the people elected their representatives and had a say in the making of the laws.Under the kings there was a rule by one person. Under the republic, the people elected their representatives and had a say in the making of the laws.Under the kings there was a rule by one person. Under the republic, the people elected their representatives and had a say in the making of the laws.Under the kings there was a rule by one person. Under the republic, the people elected their representatives and had a say in the making of the laws.Under the kings there was a rule by one person. Under the republic, the people elected their representatives and had a say in the making of the laws.Under the kings there was a rule by one person. Under the republic, the people elected their representatives and had a say in the making of the laws.Under the kings there was a rule by one person. Under the republic, the people elected their representatives and had a say in the making of the laws.
"A republic, if you can keep it."