Generally speaking pure socialism exists nowhere. Nations where the government has allot of power in the economics of a country but allows freedom of speech, different political parties, the secret ballot, free unions, and a good degree of private enterprise are called democratic socialist......
..In these countries by voting, the people can change the economic policies of their government.
In contrast, a theoretical communist country, much like the former USSR was, and now to a large degree China, the government is authoritarian. Only the communist party is allowed. This also means that freedom of speech is very limited, no major private enterprises can exist, and if they do, they are closely controlled by the communist government. Wages are also controlled.
In my view, democratic socialism is far better than a communist system.
Socialism offers more freedom than communism.
False, communism when actually employed in government is much more controlling than standard socialism. Communism is an extreme version of socialism. Under communism, private ownership, private property & business ownership is forbidden. Fascism is a less extreme version of socialism. Under Fascism, business & property ownership is allowed but controlled & directed by the government.
Socialism and communism both advocate for the collective ownership of resources and the means of production, aiming to create a more equal society where wealth is distributed more evenly among the population.
Communism is generally regarded to be a more developed form of socialism. Socialism and communism are both based on social ownership of the means of production and social appropriation of the surplus product. From a Marxist analysis, communism becomes technically feasible once productive technology enables superabundance, short work hours, and free distribution of goods and services. Communism can therefore be thought of as an advanced development of socialism.
Communism and socialism are both political and economic systems that aim to create a more equal society. The main difference is that communism advocates for a classless society where all property is owned by the community, while socialism allows for some private ownership and a more gradual transition to equality.
"The Communist Manifesto" co-written with Friedrich Engels in 1848. It had more to do with communism than socialism.
Communism and socialism both aim to create a more equal society by redistributing wealth and resources among the population. They both advocate for collective ownership of the means of production and the elimination of social classes.
Under capitalism, most people have little freedom of choice, as they have to work for an employer. Socialism will provide much more freedom, without the coercion of the wages system.
Picking up socialism/communism - technically actually it has more to do with Soviet Union.
It depends what you mean by "most powerful". If you mean "most advanced", Communism was the most advanced stage of society posited by Karl Marx and Engels. The progression was from Feudalism to Capitalism to Socialism to Communism. If by powerful you mean the most influential paradigm and ideology today, it would be capitalism in its neoliberal flavor.
Supposedly communism is simply referring to how much regulation the economy should have, the problem is that most "communist" countries have histories of human rights abuses. The current platform of the Communist Party USA illustrates a "communist democracy" where people would enjoy the same civil rights they do now but would heavily regulate corporations but not a lot of people trust them because of the history that communism has in other countries. In a real sense, the answer of democratic socialism may come closer to a better economy. Communism seeks to create a classless society, this means the use of force, and the "leaders" retain their "class of leadership".
Capitalism allows for more freedom for businesses than socialism does