Within the political science community there are is a split on views considering the role of private money to influence governance. An overwhelming majority concurs that campaign money is inherently corruptive to a democratic system. In this angle they are very skeptical of and categorically reject Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. Other camps are wary of unrestricted campaign finance, but are of the opinion that the expenditure of money is freedom of speech and association, and thus protected.
Historians and political scientists agree that no one knows exactly when, where and how the first government began.
The answer is a theory. A view that is not well-tested and widely accepted is just a hypothesis. A law has to be indisputable not just widely accepted
Most scientists agree that there are 5 big cats:LionsTigersLeopardsSnow leopardsJaguarsA minority include cheetahs and cougars but this is not widely accepted.
Girolamo Fabrici
Those would be the pseudo scientists.
yes
Yes, the majority of scientists agree that global warming is happening and that it is having a significant impact on the environment.
theroy
96.3349%
They didn't then and they do not now.
Answer: Certainly not.
The overwhelming majority of scientists agree that global warming is real. Multiple studies have shown that around 97 of climate scientists support the consensus that human activities are causing global warming.