The Chinese constitution accepts that China is a dictatorship. Article 1 of the 1982 Constitution states:"The People's Republic of China is a socialist state under the people's democratic dictatorship led by the working class and based on the alliance of workers and peasants."The word "dictatorship" features eight times in total throughout the constitution. The full text of the constitution is available in English at http://english.people.com.cn/constitution/constitution.htmlThe Chinese government can also been seen as meeting the modern description of a dictatorship through its actions. A system of dictatorship can refer to a ruling system which is absolute and unrestricted by law. The Chinese government is not fettered in its actions by a libertarian constitution in the same way that the governments of the USA and most western liberal democracies are.The constitution of China does not have any legal force against the Chinese government. Unlike western liberal democracies such as the USA, individuals in China do not have a forum, such as a court, in which to assert their constitutional rights against government actions.Furthermore, the Chinese constitution does not establish a separation of state powers, which allows for government action to go unchecked. This results in the rule of the government being unrestricted, which is by definition a dictatorship.
liberal (novanet)
liberal
liberal
we must stay still to prevent a bee sting.
liberal (novanet)
liberal (novanet)
liberal (novanet)
confirmed immiment terrorist plan of action against US interest.
any one of the objects motion should be prevented
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
The government can move more quickly and decisively than a government in which many voices are heard before taking action.