The decision to increase foreign aid should consider both humanitarian and strategic interests. Enhanced foreign aid can help address global challenges such as poverty, disease, and climate change, fostering stability and goodwill. It also serves U.S. interests by promoting economic development and political stability in partner countries, which can reduce the likelihood of conflict and migration. Ultimately, the effectiveness and impact of such aid should guide any increase in funding.
none!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The U.S. should not give foreign aid. When we attacked Hiroshima what did we do next? We rebuilt them, why? To allow them to attack us again of course. India is its own country, why send so much money to a foreign place that doesn't seem to get any better, when the streets and slums of the U.S. could use the money better?
The U.S. should not give foreign aid. When we attacked Hiroshima what did we do next? We rebuilt them, why? To allow them to attack us again of course. India is its own country, why send so much money to a foreign place that doesn't seem to get any better, when the streets and slums of the U.S. could use the money better?
1.5 billion
It has not stopped. Israel is a recipient of US foreign aid, in the form of grants and loan guarantees. Other current recipients of US foreign aid include Egypt, Jordan, Pakistan, India, Russia, West Bank and Gaza.
The US offers foreign aid mostly to support struggling democracies and countries that are critical to foreign policy objectives is true.
The Netherlands is a very wealthy country (17th in the world by GDP). As such it requires no foreign aid.
US Foreign aid is a program that probably few if any nations in the world offer.
PCH Answer: Venezuela
to fund their production of muskrats
1.5 billion
Someone should improve this answer. Can't believe it's not answered yet. I asked this over a year ago.