The power of the national government to declare war is an example of an expressed power. Another example is the power to levy taxes.
There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on a variety of factors, including the specific country in question and the particular type of government. However, in general, governments with a weak national government are considered to be less effective and less stable than those with a strong national government. This is because a weak national government is less able to effectively manage the country's affairs and to protect the rights and interests of its citizens. In addition, a weak national government is more likely to be overthrown by a strong, centralized government.
The likely word is federal, referring to a national government as a federation.
The executive branch, legislative branch, and judicial branch of the national government likely participated in the process described in the newspaper headlines depending on the specific issue being covered. Each branch plays a different role in the governance and decision-making process of the government.
Strong governments found in towns & villages, and a relatively weak national government.
a national bank, a limited national government, an economy based on farming, and the strict interpretation of the Constitution.
National Park Service ~* Ayo Monique *~ :)
A federalist pamphleteer
Americans believed that the British government had deprived people of their rights. They thought this was likely to happen with any national government that was both powerful and far away from the people.
There has been a long standing legal argument if a government can go BK. Recent cases and changes to the BK laws make it clear it is possible. However, it is much more likely one would default on a specific debt and issue new bonds/debt to cover it...perhaps losing some State assets in the process.
It is a measure of how likely it is that a specific event will occur.It is a measure of how likely it is that a specific event will occur.It is a measure of how likely it is that a specific event will occur.It is a measure of how likely it is that a specific event will occur.
Yes - assuming it is within that courts jurisdiction to deal with that law. They are more likely however to declare specific sections invalid, as usually the case before them will not deal with the whole act. (Remember - judges are there to settle the dispute in front of them, if their case neednt reference a section, they wont touch it)
Yes.