answersLogoWhite

0

Would interfere with individual rights.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Most opponents of ratification believed the new Constitution gave too little power to the National Government true or false?

First, the people are represented by Senators and Congressmen. Second, the question of whether or not the Constitution gave the Federal Government too much power is debatable. The constitution mainly provides for the organization of the Branches of Government and restrictions on its power. The Federal Government tends to assume the power to give the people what it assumes they want. The Federal Government has gained power over the years. It is debatable what powers the constitution gave the Federal Government.


What were main argument for and against ratification of the constitution?

The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.


What power does the judicial branch have?

The power to decide and contrives. They have to decide whether a national or state law conflicts with the constitution.


Who has power to decide whether or not an action of the government violates the Constitution?

Courts


Who has the power to decide whether or not an action of the government violates the Constitution.?

Courts


Who has the power to decide whether or not an action of the government violated the constitution?

Courts


Who has the power to decide whether or not an action of the government violate Constitution?

Courts


Who has the power to decide whether not an action of the government violates the Constitution?

Courts


How did the ratification process provide a widespread public debate about an important political decision?

The debates in the states lasted ten months. It was an intense and sometimes bitter political struggle. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had many arguments but the most intense ones were 1. Whether the constitution would maintain republican government. 2. Whether the national government would have too much power. 3. Whether or not a bill of rights was needed in the constitution.


What were the main arguments for and against constitution?

The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.


What has the power to decide whether or not an action of the government violates the constitution?

Cabinet members - WRONG ANSWER


Which government entity reviews laws and decides whether they are within the guidelines of the Constitution?

The Senate reviews laws and decides whether they are within the guidelines of the Constitution.