No, the rich people wanted to get rid of the kings so they decided to get rid of them, but they couldn't do it on their own, so they decided to get the poor men to do it for them. But the poor men wanted something in return, so the rich people said ok, if you fight for us we wil give you power, so the poor men said yes to the rich people and they went to fight. When the fight was over and the poor men had won, the poor men went to ask for their power but instead the rich people didn't want to give them any power. And blah blah blah.
Athenian democracy, Roman Republic, Roman Empire
In true democracy people have right to vote and true democracy involves people rights . A true democracy is place where the citizenry is actively involved in the process of governance and civil society.
True Democracy - album - was created in 1982-05.
roman
The countries you have named all practice representative democracy (oligarchy) as opposed to true democracy.
The Roman Empire was not a democracy, there were no votes and no voted elected officials. It was however designed as a Republic which had appointed representation, Senators.
No it does not. They are a republic and not a democracy. There is no head of state in a republic.
true.
Their territory was too large to govern by democracy
Democracy and democrat are Greek words. Democracy means power by the people (demos)
Roman's did a few things to expand their democracy. They made more people and money.
u.s. is actually a republic , not true or a true democracy