There is no such thing given the context of the question.
There are either rights, shared by minority and majority alike; or there is no rights but what the majority would grant to the minority - therefore they (the majority) have no responsibilities to the minority at all.
A pro about majority rule is, the interest of the larger half of the respective area are represented. The best interest of the larger half of the population is used. A con is, not every one is represented in majority rule. Some may be outraged. But majority is the lesser of many evils.
for majority rule
Majority Rule.
To determine if this was an example of true majority rule, we need to assess whether the majority of participants had their preferences reflected in the decision-making process. True majority rule implies that more than half of the participants supported the outcome, ensuring that the decision aligns with the majority's will. If the decision reflects the preferences of less than half or if there were significant barriers preventing some voices from being heard, then it would not be considered true majority rule.
Natural rights.
What is an example of majority rule and minority rights?
A rule of the majority is called "majority rule". It is a principle that a decision is made by a vote in which more than half of the members of the group agree.
the largest minority will make the rule if there is no majority
Majority rule
A pro about majority rule is, the interest of the larger half of the respective area are represented. The best interest of the larger half of the population is used. A con is, not every one is represented in majority rule. Some may be outraged. But majority is the lesser of many evils.
The opposite of majority rule is minority rule. This means that the population or selection that is least represented will decide the outcome.
Dictatorship or minority rule