they both do stuff
direct democracy is when each person rules and indirect is when people vote for people who rule.
A direct democracy
heather was here!
Direct democracy is a system where citizens directly participate in decision-making through voting on laws and policies. Indirect democracy, also known as representative democracy, involves citizens electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf.
Direct Democracy: People represent themselves. Indirect Democracy: People elect representatives to represent them. :)
There are no officials in a direct democracy, in a direct democracy all citizens vote on all the issues, unlike a representative or an indirect democracy (which is what the united states is). In a indirect democracy citizens of voting age who are registered to vote elect officials.
No, a direct democracy could always be possible, though largely impracticable in larger states.
Indirect democracy!
Direct democracy is bad because indirect democracy is good. BB Netinyahu x
In a direct democracy, all voters get to vote on all issues. In an indirect democracy, voters vote for people to represent them, and the representatives are the ones who then vote on the various issues that governments deal with.
Presidential and Parliamentary. Presidential which is direct democracy and Parliamentary (like UK) which is indirect democracy.
The Philippines has a indirect democracy, where citizens elect representatives who make decisions on their behalf. The country operates under a presidential system with a separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.