0
What else can I help you with?
Is paying someone under the table to houseclean illegal and or immoral?
Definitely illegal and probably a little immoral.
What are immoral deeds?
Immoral, referring to conduct, applies to one who acts contrary to or does not obey or conform to standards of morality; it may also mean licentious and perhaps dissipated. ... Immoral, amoral, nonmoral, and unmoral are sometimes confused with one another. Immoral means not moral and connotes evil or licentious behavior.
Is pleasuring one's senses moral?
The answer is a yes and a no. An example situation is watching porn. Under moral sensism, which states that pleasuring one's senses to be moral, doing such as can be considered to be moral because you are pleasuring your senses, but under other moral philosophy, such act is immoral. Thus, moral sensism is not a good basis for one's norm of morality. It has it's flaws and defects when one would over look at it in the scheme of philosophies such that is is somehow one sided as egoism (satisfaction for one's self) and can eliminate people of the right conscience. More over, moral sensism can be a good norm of morality when dealt with other moral philosophies and when one's conscience is right.
What does human capacity for evil mean?
The human capacity for evil refers to the potential within individuals to commit harmful or immoral acts, often driven by factors such as fear, hatred, greed, or a desire for power. This concept suggests that under certain circumstances, any person can engage in behavior that causes suffering to others. It highlights the complexity of human nature, where empathy and compassion can coexist with darker impulses. Understanding this capacity can encourage reflection on moral choices and societal influences that shape behavior.
What is a example of a moral decision?
In the philosophical branch known as ethics, every decision has an ethical component. In the colloquial sense, a decision that is "moral" as opposed to "immoral" is one that would adhere to the normative metric of a given ethical system. Under utilitarianism, a decision that generates the greatest utility for the greatest number would be colloquially "moral. "
What are the problems in using moral law as a basis for criminal law?
Because YOUR morals may not be the same as mine, and I may not consent to living under YOUR moral laws. And YOU my not want to live under MY moral laws.
Is homosexuality all right if it's not lust?
The question implies that there are circumstances under which Homosexuality is NOT all right, and that lust is inherently not all right. That would be a question pertaining to personal ideology, religious beliefs or morals. In point of fact, both homosexuality and lust are definable as normal within the range of human behavioral traits. Lust is a biological response that helps drive human beings to reproduce. Homosexuality is behavior that appears in many species of animals in almost the same incidence as it does in human beings. These facts argue that both are perfectly normal. Whether or not you feel that either is morally wrong is a belief system you are imposing on behavoirs that, in themselves, have no moral component. They are simply evolved traits within our species. For example, Human beings can kill each other... we have evolved with the ability to do that. That ability itself is not a moral issue. It would not have evolved if it was not advantageous in some sense. However, we all agree that there are circumstance under which killing is justifiable, and others when it is not. Therefore, it is context and intent that determines whether killing is moral, not the killing itself. Lust CAN be immoral, if it is indulged with immoral intent. Just as homosexuality can be immoral if its is expressed as, say, rape. However, neither, in and off itself, can be correctly characterized as wrong.
Under the Constitution government is allowed to discriminate in some way among groups of people. Otherwise the government would be unable to .?
the government would be unable to regulate human behavior
What are the three main theories under the comparative justice framework?
The three main theories under the comparative justice framework are moral universalism, cultural relativism, and moral pluralism. Moral universalism asserts that certain moral values and principles are universally applicable, while cultural relativism argues that moral standards are relative to individual cultures. Moral pluralism suggests that multiple moral frameworks can coexist and be valid.
What are Moral agents?
Moral agents are individuals or entities capable of making ethical decisions and understanding the consequences of their actions. They possess the ability to discern right from wrong and are accountable for their choices. Typically, moral agents include humans, as they have the cognitive capacity for moral reasoning, though some argue that certain animals and artificial intelligences may also qualify under specific conditions. The concept emphasizes responsibility and the capacity for ethical reflection in guiding behavior.
What is the legal definition of the term "creed"?
The legal definition of the term "creed" refers to a system of religious or moral beliefs that guides a person's behavior and actions. It is protected under laws that prohibit discrimination based on religion or belief.
In the Mexican revolution vitoriano Huerta seized power and executed Francisco Madero which action did the us president take under moral diplomacy?
He did not accept a "government of butchers" and favored another reformer.
