0
Major political change is often driven by a combination of social movements, economic shifts, and leadership dynamics. Social unrest or widespread dissatisfaction can catalyze movements that challenge existing systems. Economic factors, such as inequality or crises, can also prompt shifts in political power or ideology. Additionally, influential leaders or events can act as catalysts for change, reshaping political landscapes and policies.
What else can I help you with?
What are major details?
Explains and develops the main idea.
How would political in Georgia change if there were more than two major political parties?
It wouldn’t change much. Might split the vote allowing one party to win over the other.
Is the theory that explains the legitimacy of kingship in the political system?
human right.
What Five major external forces seem to drive the rate of change and shape your economic and political landscape?
5 major external forces seem to drive the rate of change and shape our economic and political landscape: globalization, technology, organizational consolidation, the empowered consumer, and government policy and regulation.
What was a major political consequence of the Vietnam war?
What was a major political consequence of the Vietnam War
What explains the appearance of political parties in the US after the adoption of the Constitution?
the t pardy
Which was a major political change in Latin America in the 19th century?
strong natioalistic feelings led to many new nations
What was a major difference between Romanticism and communism in the 18th and 19th centuries?
communism was focus on achieving practical political change
Which communist country during the bush years did pro democracy demostations fail to bring about major political change?
China
What is a major reference source that explains NJP?
Warfighting Handbook
What was the major political consequences of the Vietnam war?
What was a major political consequence of the Vietnam War
Why does change so frequently become a political issue in organizations?
Due to the fact that change threatens the status quo, it inherently implies political activity. Internal change agents typically are individuals high in the organization who have a lot to lose from change. What if they are no longer the ones the organization values? Politics suggests that the impetus for change is more likely to come from outside change agents. Managers who have spent their entire careers with a single organization and eventually achieve a senior position in the hierarchy are often major impediments to change. You should expect that long-time career executives will be sources of resistance. This, incidentally, explains why boards of directors that recognize the imperative for the rapid introduction of second-order change in their organizations frequently turn to outside candidates for new leadership.
