1. Though decision-making is cumbersome, involves time and is calculative, the decisions made under this system are more effective, and are generally accepted by people 2. It's a more democratic form of system rather than the one party or two party system 3. It allows a number of voices and demands within the country to enjoy political representation
Yes, Italy has a multiparty system. However, there seems to be some consolidation going on. It will be interesting to see if it turns into a two or three party state. The parliamentary democracies of Europe, Spain, France, England, Germany, tend toward 2 or 3 party states. Italy seems headed in that direction. It will be interesting to watch.
Both. they are a multiparty-democracy, where some are republican and some are democratic.
cause their smart people
In 2010, more than half of the nations of the world have multiparty systems. All 27 members of the European Union and all 12 members of the Union of South American Nations, as well as most of the 54 members of the Commonwealth of Nations (formerly the British Commonwealth) have multiparty systems. In addition, Japan, Mexico, Indonesia, Israel and several other Asian, African, Central American and island nations have multiparty systems. Notable nations whose political systems do not meet the definiton of multiparty system are Russia, the United States of America, the People's Republic of China, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Cuba and North Korea.
It all depends on the person themselves. Something like being in favor stem embryos cell research is a personal decision someone has to make themselves. There are gay people in favor of it and there are gay people who are against it. Compare it to the belief in the Christian God, some gay people believe in God some do not, some gay people are Muslim, Jewish, some are Agnostic ,some are Atheist and some believe in some other kind of gods that i haven't said above. So your religious belief is a decision you have to make yourself and so is being in favor or against stem embryos cell research.
Some states were not in favor of a Bill of Rights because they had their own laws to protect people's freedoms. They also felt that the Bill of Rights was not inclusive enough.
they had their own laws to protect people's freedoms.
they had their own laws to protect people's freedoms.
They don't have enough money that's why
yes if its a genuine and a legal favor
A single party state is a country where there is only one legal political party. This can be useful in countries where people have not got the hang of the idea that if you support a party which is not in power it is not necessarily treason. The country can get used to the forms of a multiparty democracy without the real competition. Some single party states have successfully made the transition to multiparty states. Others have not.
because the way the government works they are not a democracy. they are a bunch of happy people. does that answer your question? they can do what ever they want