The difference is subtle because both kings and dictators have absolute and complete power (although this is not always the case). Kings, supposedly, have some legitimate claim to the power, either because of a religious anointing, or because they descendants of the previous kings. Dictators on the other hand took their power by force and have no legitimate grounds to the power, other than they have greater strength than their adversaries.
In many cases Kings were seen as being appointed by God.
Same meaning, different term.
no he is not
He is a dictator. The Belgian population hates him.
Julius Caesar wasn't a king. He was a dictator. The people loved him but, he was a dictator nonetheless.
The difference between a shogun and a samurai is like the difference between a king and a knight.
what is the differents between "king in Prussia"and"king of Prussia"???
He was a king and not a dictator. The position of King was his by birthright and he was also considered placed on the throne by God. A dictator is a man who takes power from others. He doesn't inherit the throne, but takes it. The citizens of the country have no choice with a dictator, but with a king very few are overthrown and if they are it is by the people.
King are richer
no
He is a dictator.
ant king
INSTINCT!